arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.11368cs.CLcs.AI

大语言模型能够进行多维度分析性写作评估:一项关于二语研究生水平学术英语写作的案例研究

LLMs can Perform Multi-Dimensional Analytic Writing Assessments: A Case Study of L2 Graduate-Level Academic English Writing

Department of Linguistics & Institute for Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University(语言学系与高级计算科学研究所,石溪大学);Department of Linguistics, University of Saskatchewan(语言学系,萨斯喀彻温大学)

Zhengxiang Wang, Veronika Makarova, Zhi Li, Jordan Kodner, Owen Rambow

AI总结:

本文研究大语言模型在二语研究生学术写作多维度分析性评估中的表现,提出可解释且可扩展的反馈评论质量评估框架,并验证了LLM评估的可靠性。

摘要:

本文探讨了大语言模型在多维度分析性写作评估中的表现,即它们基于多个评估标准同时提供分数和评论的能力。我们使用一个由二语研究生撰写的文献综述语料库,该语料库由人类专家依据9项分析性标准进行评估,并在多种条件下提示多个流行的大语言模型执行相同任务。为了评估反馈评论的质量,我们应用了一个新颖的反馈评论质量评估框架。与依赖人工判断的现有方法相比,该框架具有可解释性、成本效益高、可扩展性强且可复现的特点。我们发现,大语言模型能够生成相当不错且总体可靠的多维度分析性评估。我们公开了语料库和代码以支持可复现性。

英文摘要:

The paper explores the performance of LLMs in the context of multi-dimensional analytic writing assessments, i.e. their ability to provide both scores and comments based on multiple assessment criteria. Using a corpus of literature reviews written by L2 graduate students and assessed by human experts against 9 analytic criteria, we prompt several popular LLMs to perform the same task under various conditions. To evaluate the quality of feedback comments, we apply a novel feedback comment quality evaluation framework. This framework is interpretable, cost-efficient, scalable, and reproducible, compared to existing methods that rely on manual judgments. We find that LLMs can generate reasonably good and generally reliable multi-dimensional analytic assessments. We release our corpus and code for reproducibility.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑