生成式人工智能与学术写作及出版中的语言多样性：来自世界英语的视角
Generative AI and linguistic diversity in academic writing and publishing: Perspectives from World Englishes
浏览论文内容
中文总结 AI 辅助
本文通过5位学者的结构化对话，探讨GenAI对学术写作语言多样性的影响，提出需制定公平政策、培养AI素养等应对建议，指出GenAI既可能强化语言层级也可成为抵抗载体。
中文摘要 AI 辅助
生成式人工智能（GenAI）在学术写作与出版（AWP）领域的兴起，引发了关于全球学术交流中语言包容性及多样英语合法性的问题。本文通过一项结构化学术对话回应这些问题，对话参与者包括5位来自世界英语及相关领域的社会语言学家，围绕5个指导性问题展开，探讨GenAI工具如何影响写作实践、强化或打破主流语言规范、以及带来何种伦理挑战。参与者反思了GenAI在推动写作流程民主化方面的潜力，同时担忧其可能边缘化少数群体语言变体、削弱学术写作的细微差别。对话中浮现出语言（非）正义、研究者能动性、机构责任等主题，参与者呼吁制定兼顾公平的政策、培养批判性AI素养、在GenAI开发中开展包容性协同设计。本文展现了对话式反思对理解GenAI在AWP中角色的价值，结论指出：尽管GenAI可能强化现有层级，但取决于致力于语言多样性的学术群体如何设计、管控和使用它，它也可成为抵抗的载体。
英文摘要
The rise of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in academic writing and publishing (AWP) raises questions about linguistic inclusivity and the legitimacy of diverse Englishes in global scholarly communication. This article responds to these questions through a structured scholarly dialogue involving five sociolinguists from World Englishes and adjacent fields. Organised around five guiding questions, the dialogue interrogates how GenAI tools influence writing practices, reinforce or disrupt dominant language norms, and raise ethical challenges. Contributors reflect on the potential of GenAI to democratise writing processes while also raising concerns about GenAI's tendency to marginalise minoritised varieties and flatten nuance in scholarly writing. Across the dialogue, themes of linguistic (in)justice, researcher agency, and institutional responsibility emerge, with contributors calling for equity-informed policies, critical AI literacy, and inclusive co-design in GenAI development. The article shows the value of dialogic reflection in understanding GenAI's role in AWP. It concludes that while GenAI may reinforce existing hierarchies, it can also serve as a site of resistance, depending on how it is designed, governed and used within scholarly communities committed to linguistic diversity.
