arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.04441astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EPastro-ph.IM
收藏

M矮星周围的 debris盘:赫歇尔DEBRIS巡天

Debris disks around M dwarfs: The Herschel DEBRIS survey

Jean-Francois Lestrade, Brenda C. Matthews, Grant M. Kennedy, Bruce Sibthorpe, Mark C. Wyatt, Mark Booth, Jane S. Greaves, Gaspard Duchene, Amaya Moro-Martin, Cassien Jobic

AI总结:

本文分析赫歇尔DEBRIS巡天中94颗M矮星的PACS观测数据,发现2个debris盘,探测率2.1%±2.7%/-0.7%,指出其巡天深度较FGK星浅,相同深度下K星与M星探测率一致,质疑亮盘的代表性。

摘要:

赫歇尔开放时间关键项目“红外与亚毫米波无偏侦察的盘发射(DEBRIS)”是对每类A-M型恒星中最近的约100颗恒星进行的无偏巡天,采用统一的光度灵敏度观测,以搜索其周围的冷 debris盘。本文介绍了该项目中94颗DEBRIS M矮星的光电导阵列相机与光谱仪(PACS)光度观测分析,此前已有两篇关于DEBRIS A型星和FGK型星子样本的配套论文。在M矮星子样本中,已检测到两个debris盘,分别围绕M3V矮星GJ581和M4V矮星北落师门C(LP876-10)。该结果给出的盘探测率为2.1%,68%置信水平下的误差为+2.7%至-0.7%,显著低于DEBRIS项目中早型恒星的探测率。然而,当在盘的尘埃分数光度与黑体半径的物理参数空间中研究时,DEBRIS M矮星子样本的巡天深度约为FGK子样本的十分之一。此外,若DEBRIS K型星子样本在该参数空间中以相同的浅深度观测,其测得的盘探测率与M矮星子样本的探测率在统计上一致。因此,在考虑物理参数空间相同区域的盘时,DEBRIS项目中K型星到M型星子样本的debris盘发生率似乎并未下降。另一种解释是,M矮星子样本中发现的仅有的两个亮盘,实际上可能不具有整个群体的统计代表性。

英文摘要:

The Herschel open-time key program Disc Emission via a Bias-free Reconnaissance in the Infrared and Sub-millimeter (DEBRIS) is an unbiased survey of the nearest ~100 stars for each stellar type A-M observed with a uniform photometric sensitivity to search for cold debris disks around them. The analysis of the Photoconductor Array Camera and Spectrometer (PACS) photometric observations of the 94 DEBRIS M dwarfs of this program is presented in this paper, following upon two companion papers on the DEBRIS A-star and FGK-star subsamples. In the M-dwarf subsample, two debris disks have been detected, around the M3V dwarf GJ581 and the M4V dwarf FomalhautC (LP876-10). This result gives a disk detection rate of 2.1^{+2.7}_{-0.7}% at the 68% confidence level, significantly less than measured for earlier stellar types in the DEBRIS program. However, we show that the survey of the DEBRIS M-dwarf subsample is about ten times shallower than the surveys of the DEBRIS FGK subsamples when studied in the physical parameter space of the disk's fractional dust luminosity versus blackbody radius. Furthermore, had the DEBRIS K-star subsample been observed at the same shallower depth in this parameter space, its measured disk detection rate would have been statistically consistent with the one found for the M-dwarf subsample. Hence, the incidence of debris disks does not appear to drop from the K subsample to the M subsample of the DEBRIS program, when considering disks in the same region of physical parameter space. An alternative explanation is that the only two bright disks discovered in the M-dwarf subsample would not, in fact, be statistically representative of the whole population.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑