arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2502.03608cs.LGcs.AI

表格数据上的 (GG) MoE 与 MLP 对比

(GG) MoE vs. MLP on Tabular Data

Independent Researcher

Andrei Chernov

AI总结:

本文提出带 Gumbel-Softmax 门控的 GG MoE 模型,在 38 个表格数据集上以更少参数超越标准 MoE 和 MLP,证明其可作为 MLP 的高效替代方案。

摘要:

近年来,大量工作致力于将现代神经网络架构适配到表格数据上。然而,尽管这些模型拥有更多参数以及更长的训练和推理时间,它们往往仍无法稳定超越普通多层感知机(MLP)神经网络。此外,基于 MLP 的集成方法近期在性能和效率上已展现出优于先进深度学习方法的优势。因此,与其专注于构建更深、更复杂的深度学习模型,我们提出研究是否可以在不牺牲性能的前提下,用更高效的架构替代 MLP 神经网络。本文首先提出 GG MoE,一种带有 Gumbel-Softmax 门控函数的混合专家(MoE)模型。随后我们证明,与标准 MoE 和 MLP 模型相比,带有嵌入层的 GG MoE 在 38 个数据集上取得了最高性能。最后,我们表明 MoE 和 GG MoE 使用的参数量都显著少于 MLP,使其成为扩展和集成方法中一个有前景的替代方案。

英文摘要:

In recent years, significant efforts have been directed toward adapting modern neural network architectures for tabular data. However, despite their larger number of parameters and longer training and inference times, these models often fail to consistently outperform vanilla multilayer perceptron (MLP) neural networks. Moreover, MLP-based ensembles have recently demonstrated superior performance and efficiency compared to advanced deep learning methods. Therefore, rather than focusing on building deeper and more complex deep learning models, we propose investigating whether MLP neural networks can be replaced with more efficient architectures without sacrificing performance. In this paper, we first introduce GG MoE, a mixture-of-experts (MoE) model with a Gumbel-Softmax gating function. We then demonstrate that GG MoE with an embedding layer achieves the highest performance across $38$ datasets compared to standard MoE and MLP models. Finally, we show that both MoE and GG MoE utilize significantly fewer parameters than MLPs, making them a promising alternative for scaling and ensemble methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑