arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.04491cs.LG

默认即更优:面向表格数据的强预调优MLP与提升树

Better by Default: Strong Pre-Tuned MLPs and Boosted Trees on Tabular Data

Inria Paris(法国国家信息与自动化研究所巴黎分部);Inria Saclay(法国国家信息与自动化研究所萨克雷分部);Ecole Normale Superieure PSL University(巴黎高等师范学院PSL大学);University of Stuttgart(斯图加特大学)

David Holzmüller, Léo Grinsztajn, Ingo Steinwart

AI总结:

针对表格数据深度学习方法调优成本高、速度慢的问题,提出改进的RealMLP模型及元调优的默认参数,在多基准测试中实现了与GBDTs相当的性能,且无需超参数调优即可取得优异效果。

摘要:

在表格数据的分类与回归任务中,梯度提升决策树(GBDTs)的主导地位近来受到深度学习方法的挑战,这类方法通常速度慢得多且需要大量超参数调优。我们通过提出两方面内容来解决这一差异:(a)RealMLP,一种改进的多层感知器(MLP);(b)针对GBDTs和RealMLP的强元调优默认参数。我们在包含118个数据集的元训练基准上对RealMLP及默认参数进行调优,并在包含90个数据集的独立元测试基准,以及Grinsztajn等人(2022)提出的适配GBDT的基准上,将它们与经超参数优化的版本进行对比。我们在中等至大规模表格数据集(1K至500K样本)上的基准测试结果显示,与其他神经基线模型相比,RealMLP在时间-精度权衡上表现出色,且在基准得分上与GBDTs具有竞争力。此外,结合RealMLP与改进了默认参数的GBDTs,无需超参数调优即可取得优异结果。最后,我们证明RealMLP的部分改进也能显著提升采用默认参数的TabR的性能。

英文摘要:

For classification and regression on tabular data, the dominance of gradient-boosted decision trees (GBDTs) has recently been challenged by often much slower deep learning methods with extensive hyperparameter tuning. We address this discrepancy by introducing (a) RealMLP, an improved multilayer perceptron (MLP), and (b) strong meta-tuned default parameters for GBDTs and RealMLP. We tune RealMLP and the default parameters on a meta-train benchmark with 118 datasets and compare them to hyperparameter-optimized versions on a disjoint meta-test benchmark with 90 datasets, as well as the GBDT-friendly benchmark by Grinsztajn et al. (2022). Our benchmark results on medium-to-large tabular datasets (1K--500K samples) show that RealMLP offers a favorable time-accuracy tradeoff compared to other neural baselines and is competitive with GBDTs in terms of benchmark scores. Moreover, a combination of RealMLP and GBDTs with improved default parameters can achieve excellent results without hyperparameter tuning. Finally, we demonstrate that some of RealMLP's improvements can also considerably improve the performance of TabR with default parameters.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑