arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2501.04423physics.atom-ph
收藏

使用类氦离子进行强场 QED 测试的贝叶斯方法

A Bayesian Approach for Strong Field QED Tests with He-like Ions

César Godinho, Jorge Machado, Nancy Paul, Mauro Guerra, Paul Indelicato, Martino Trassinelli

AI总结:

针对类氦离子QED效应理论实验偏差的频率派分析矛盾,提出贝叶斯统计方法为Z=5至92的偏离模型分配概率,发现当前无显著差异并指明了未来测量精度需求。

摘要:

文献中已对类氦离子中的量子电动力学 (QED) 效应进行了理论与实验的详细比较,以寻找新物理的线索。对现有原子跃迁能数据的不同频率派统计分析,在是否存在可能偏离理论预测的问题上得出了矛盾的结论。我们在此提出一种使用贝叶斯统计的方法,该方法能够为 $Z = 5$ 至 92 的类氦离子不同的理论偏离模型分配定量概率。潜在的超出标准模型或高阶 QED 效应的偏离使用 $f(Z) \propto Z^k$ 函数进行建模。考虑当前可用数据,未发现理论与实验之间存在显著差异,并且我们表明最近的实验减小了文献中先前观察到的可能偏差。利用过去的测量结果以及对不同偏离模型的加权平均,我们指出了未来测量研究潜在分歧所需的精度。

英文摘要:

Detailed comparisons between theory and experiment for quantum electrodynamics (QED) effects in He-like ions have been performed in the literature to search for hints of new physics. Different frequentist statistical analyses of the existing atomic transition energy data have shown contradictory conclusions as to the presence of possible deviations from the theory predictions. We present here an approach using Bayesian statistics which allows to assign quantitative probabilities to the different deviation models from theory for He-like ions for $Z = 5$ to 92. Potential deviations beyond the standard model or higher order QED effects are modeled with $f(Z) \propto Z^k$ functions. Considering the currently available data, no significant difference between theory and experiment is found, and we show that recent experiments have reduced the possible deviations previously observed in the literature. Using past measurements and a weighted average on the different deviation models, we indicate the accuracy required for future measurements to investigated possible divergences.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑