arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2412.09409gr-qc
收藏

修正引力/动态暗能量与$Λ$CDM模型:博弈是否已结束?

Modified gravity/Dynamical Dark Energy vs $Λ$CDM: is the game over?

Sergei D. Odintsov, Diego Sáez-Chillón Gómez, German S. Sharov

AI总结:

本研究针对宇宙学标准模型$Λ$CDM的检验问题,对比推广型指数$F(R)$引力、暗能量状态方程无模型参数化方案与$Λ$CDM模型,基于最新多类观测数据发现前两者拟合效果更优,$Λ$CDM在4σ置信水平下被排除。

摘要:

在过去几十年间,学界针对宇宙学标准模型即所谓$Λ$CDM模型的检验开展了广泛分析,并将其与众多描述暗能量的不同模型进行对比。修正引力理论作为$Λ$CDM模型的替代方案,在这一领域发挥了重要作用。此前的观测数据相较于其他任何模型,始终更支持$Λ$CDM模型。尽管从统计学角度而言,替代模型已展现出自身的优势,在部分情况下对观测数据的拟合效果略优于$Λ$CDM模型,但这些拟合的显著性与优度并不足以推翻宇宙学标准模型。本文研究了指数$F(R)$引力的一种推广形式,并利用最新观测数据将其与$Λ$CDM模型进行对比,同时还探究了几种知名的暗能量状态方程(EoS)的无模型参数化方案。研究将这些理论场景与最新的观测数据进行比对,数据涵盖Pantheon plus Ia型超新星数据集、哈勃参数估计值、宇宙微波背景数据以及重子声学振荡数据,其中后者包含暗能量光谱仪(Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument)合作组提供的数据。分析结果表明,标准指数$F(R)$模型的拟合效果远优于$Λ$CDM模型,后者在4$σ$置信水平下被排除。此外,状态方程的参数化结果显示暗能量的状态方程参数并非常数,$Λ$CDM模型同样在4$σ$置信水平下被排除。

英文摘要:

Over the last decades, tests on the standard model of cosmology, the so-called $Λ$CDM model, have been widely analysed and compared with many different models for describing dark energy. Modified gravities have played an important role in this sense as an alternative to $Λ$CDM model. Previous observational data has been always favouring $Λ$CDM model in comparison to any other model. While statistically speaking, alternative models have shown tehir power, fitting in some cases the observational data slightly better than $Λ$CDM, the significance and goodness of the fits were not significantly relevant to exclude the standard model of cosmology. In this paper, a generalisation of exponential $F(R)$ gravity is considered and compared with $Λ$CDM model by using the latest observational data. Also some well-known model independent parameterisations for the equation of state (EoS) of dark energy are explored. These scenarios are confronted with the renewed observational data involving the Pantheon plus datasets of supernovae type Ia, the Hubble parameter estimations, data from the cosmic microwave background and baryon acoustic oscillations, where the latter includes the data provided by Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument collaboration. Results of this analysis suggest that standard exponential $F(R)$ models provide much better fits than $Λ$CDM model, which is excluded at 4$σ$. Moreover, the parameterisations of the equation of state suggest a non-constant EoS parameter for dark energy, where $Λ$CDM model is also excluded at 4$σ$.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑