arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2412.08085cs.LGcs.AI

非近视多目标贝叶斯优化

Non-Myopic Multi-Objective Bayesian Optimization

Stanford University(斯坦福大学);Washington State University(华盛顿州立大学)

Syrine Belakaria, Alaleh Ahmadianshalchi, Barbara Engelhardt, Stefano Ermon, Janardhan Rao Doppa

AI总结:

针对多目标优化问题,提出三种基于超体积改进的非近视贝叶斯优化采集函数,显著提升了性能。

摘要:

我们考虑有限时序贯实验设计问题,以解决昂贵黑盒目标函数的多目标优化(MOO)。该问题出现在许多现实应用中,包括材料设计,在这些应用中,我们只有少量资源预算来在实验室制造和评估候选材料。我们使用贝叶斯优化(BO)框架解决此问题,并提出了首个针对MOO问题的非近视方法。先前针对单目标问题的非近视BO工作依赖Bellman最优性原理来处理前瞻推理过程。然而,该原理对大多数MOO问题不成立,因为奖励函数需满足一些条件:标量变量、单调性和可加性。我们通过使用超体积改进(HVI)作为标量化方法来应对这一挑战,这使我们能够利用Bellman方程的下界,通过用于MOO的批量期望超体积改进(EHVI)采集函数(AF)来近似有限时序。我们的公式自然允许我们使用其他基于改进的标量化方法,并将其有效性与HVI进行比较。我们为MOBO推导了三种非近视AF:1)嵌套AF,基于下界的精确计算;2)联合AF,是嵌套AF的下界;3)BINOM AF,是基于批量多目标采集函数的快速近似变体。我们在多个多样化的现实MO问题上的实验表明,我们的非近视AF显著提高了相对于现有近视AF在MOBO中的性能。

英文摘要:

We consider the problem of finite-horizon sequential experimental design to solve multi-objective optimization (MOO) of expensive black-box objective functions. This problem arises in many real-world applications, including materials design, where we have a small resource budget to make and evaluate candidate materials in the lab. We solve this problem using the framework of Bayesian optimization (BO) and propose the first set of non-myopic methods for MOO problems. Prior work on non-myopic BO for single-objective problems relies on the Bellman optimality principle to handle the lookahead reasoning process. However, this principle does not hold for most MOO problems because the reward function needs to satisfy some conditions: scalar variable, monotonicity, and additivity. We address this challenge by using hypervolume improvement (HVI) as our scalarization approach, which allows us to use a lower-bound on the Bellman equation to approximate the finite-horizon using a batch expected hypervolume improvement (EHVI) acquisition function (AF) for MOO. Our formulation naturally allows us to use other improvement-based scalarizations and compare their efficacy to HVI. We derive three non-myopic AFs for MOBO: 1) the Nested AF, which is based on the exact computation of the lower bound, 2) the Joint AF, which is a lower bound on the nested AF, and 3) the BINOM AF, which is a fast and approximate variant based on batch multi-objective acquisition functions. Our experiments on multiple diverse real-world MO problems demonstrate that our non-myopic AFs substantially improve performance over the existing myopic AFs for MOBO.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑