arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2412.02149cs.CLcs.IR

利用具有反思增量机制的大型语言模型进行比较文学文献综述

Leveraging Large Language Models for Comparative Literature Summarization with Reflective Incremental Mechanisms

Autonomous University of Nuevo León(新莱昂自治大学)

Fernando Gabriela Garcia, Spencer Burns, Harrison Fuller

AI总结:

提出 ChatCite 方法,通过多步推理、增量构建与反思记忆机制让 LLM 生成比较文献综述,并在 CompLit-LongContext 上超越 GPT-4 等基线。

摘要:

本文介绍了 ChatCite,这是一种利用大型语言模型(LLM)生成比较文献综述的新颖方法。以研究之间的关键比较为重点来总结科研论文,是学术研究中的一项基本任务。现有综述模型虽能有效生成简洁摘要,却无法提供深入的比较洞见。ChatCite 通过引入多步推理机制来解决这一局限:该机制从论文中提取关键要素,增量式构建比较综述,并通过反思记忆过程精炼输出。我们在自定义数据集 CompLit-LongContext 上评估 ChatCite,该数据集包含 1000 篇带有比较综述标注的科研论文。实验结果表明,在 ROUGE 以及新提出的 G-Score 等多项自动评估指标上,ChatCite 优于包括 GPT-4、BART、T5 和 CoT 在内的若干基线方法。人工评估进一步证实,与这些基线模型相比,ChatCite 生成的综述更连贯、更具洞见且更流畅。我们的方法在自动文献综述生成方面取得了重大进展,为研究人员高效比较和综合科学研究提供了强大工具。

英文摘要:

In this paper, we introduce ChatCite, a novel method leveraging large language models (LLMs) for generating comparative literature summaries. The ability to summarize research papers with a focus on key comparisons between studies is an essential task in academic research. Existing summarization models, while effective at generating concise summaries, fail to provide deep comparative insights. ChatCite addresses this limitation by incorporating a multi-step reasoning mechanism that extracts critical elements from papers, incrementally builds a comparative summary, and refines the output through a reflective memory process. We evaluate ChatCite on a custom dataset, CompLit-LongContext, consisting of 1000 research papers with annotated comparative summaries. Experimental results show that ChatCite outperforms several baseline methods, including GPT-4, BART, T5, and CoT, across various automatic evaluation metrics such as ROUGE and the newly proposed G-Score. Human evaluation further confirms that ChatCite generates more coherent, insightful, and fluent summaries compared to these baseline models. Our method provides a significant advancement in automatic literature review generation, offering researchers a powerful tool for efficiently comparing and synthesizing scientific research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑