LLM-ReSum: 一个通过自我评估实现LLM反思性总结的框架
LLM-ReSum: A Framework for LLM Reflective Summarization through Self-Evaluation
AI总结:
本文提出LLM-ReSum框架,通过整合LLM评估与生成,提升低质量摘要的事实准确性与覆盖率,引入新的法律文档摘要基准PatentSumEval。
摘要:
可靠的评估大语言模型(LLM)生成的摘要仍是一个开放性挑战,特别是在异构领域和文档长度方面。我们对14种自动摘要指标和基于LLM的评估器进行了全面的元评估,覆盖七个数据集,涵盖从短新闻文章到长科学、政府和法律文本(2K-27K词)的文档,包含超过1500个人类标注的摘要。我们的结果表明,传统词汇重叠指标(如ROUGE、BLEU)与人类判断的关联性较弱或为负,而任务特定的神经指标和基于LLM的评估器在对语言质量的评估上表现更佳。基于这些发现,我们提出LLM-ReSum,一个自我反思的摘要框架,通过闭环反馈机制整合LLM评估与生成,无需模型微调。在三个领域中,LLM-ReSum在事实准确性上提升了高达33%,在覆盖范围上提升了39%,人类评估者在89%的情况下更倾向于改进后的摘要。我们还引入了PatentSumEval,一个包含180个专家评估摘要的新基准,用于法律文档摘要。所有代码和数据集将在GitHub上发布。
英文摘要:
Reliable evaluation of large language model (LLM)-generated summaries remains an open challenge, particularly across heterogeneous domains and document lengths. We conduct a comprehensive meta-evaluation of 14 automatic summarization metrics and LLM-based evaluators across seven datasets spanning five domains, covering documents from short news articles to long scientific, governmental, and legal texts (2K-27K words) with over 1,500 human-annotated summaries. Our results show that traditional lexical overlap metrics (e.g., ROUGE, BLEU) exhibit weak or negative correlation with human judgments, while task-specific neural metrics and LLM-based evaluators achieve substantially higher alignment, especially for linguistic quality assessment. Leveraging these findings, we propose LLM-ReSum, a self-reflective summarization framework that integrates LLM-based evaluation and generation in a closed feedback loop without model finetuning. Across three domains, LLM-ReSum improves low-quality summaries by up to 33% in factual accuracy and 39% in coverage, with human evaluators preferring refined summaries in 89% of cases. We additionally introduce PatentSumEval, a new human-annotated benchmark for legal document summarization comprising 180 expert-evaluated summaries. All code and datasets will be released in GitHub.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。