arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2410.08097cs.RO
收藏

LiPO:用于 ICP 对比的 LiDAR 惯性里程计

LiPO: LiDAR Inertial Odometry for ICP Comparison

Carnegie Mellon University(卡内基梅隆大学);Robotics Institute(机器人研究所)

Darwin Mick, Taylor Pool, Madankumar Sathenahally Nagaraju, Michael Kaess, Howie Choset, Matt Travers

AI总结:

本文提出 LiPO 框架以直接对比 P2P-ICP 与 P2F-ICP 方法,通过基准数据集和定制 UGV 测试,量化了两者在漂移、建图精度与泛化性上的权衡。

摘要:

我们引入了一个 LiDAR 惯性里程计(LIO)框架,称为 LiPO,它能够直接对比不同的迭代最近点(ICP)点云配准方法。我们对比的两种常见 ICP 方法是点对点(P2P)和点对特征(P2F)。根据我们的经验,在 LIO 语境下,当机器人在充满挑战的环境中剧烈运动时,与 P2P-ICP 相比,P2F-ICP 会导致更小的漂移和更高的建图精度。然而,P2F-ICP 方法需要更多手动调优的超参数,这使得 P2F-ICP 在所有环境和运动中的泛化性较差。在机器人被用于跨不同环境的真实世界野外机器人应用中,尽管漂移会增加,但更具泛化性的 P2P-ICP 方法可能更受青睐。在本文中,我们寻求更好地量化 P2P-ICP 和 P2F-ICP 之间的权衡,以帮助指导何时应使用每种方法。为了探索这种权衡,我们使用 LiPO 直接对比 ICP 方法,并在相关基准数据集以及我们定制的无人地面车辆(UGV)上进行测试。我们发现,总体而言,P2F-ICP 减少了漂移并提高了建图精度,但是,P2P-ICP 在所有环境和运动中表现更加一致,且漂移增加最小。

英文摘要:

We introduce a LiDAR inertial odometry (LIO) framework, called LiPO, that enables direct comparisons of different iterative closest point (ICP) point cloud registration methods. The two common ICP methods we compare are point-to-point (P2P) and point-to-feature (P2F). In our experience, within the context of LIO, P2F-ICP results in less drift and improved mapping accuracy when robots move aggressively through challenging environments when compared to P2P-ICP. However, P2F-ICP methods require more hand-tuned hyper-parameters that make P2F-ICP less general across all environments and motions. In real-world field robotics applications where robots are used across different environments, more general P2P-ICP methods may be preferred despite increased drift. In this paper, we seek to better quantify the trade-off between P2P-ICP and P2F-ICP to help inform when each method should be used. To explore this trade-off, we use LiPO to directly compare ICP methods and test on relevant benchmark datasets as well as on our custom unpiloted ground vehicle (UGV). We find that overall, P2F-ICP has reduced drift and improved mapping accuracy, but, P2P-ICP is more consistent across all environments and motions with minimal drift increase.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑