arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2410.05723quant-ph
收藏

论扩展语境性的原理与表示

On Principles and Representations for Extended Contextuality

Matt Jones

AI总结:

本文针对Dzhafarov与Kujala提出的“量子语境性可普遍扩展至含扰动或信号系统且相关限制原理均为非实质性”的论证,从原理表达的表示依赖性、窃取论题、适用范围三方面提出反驳。

摘要:

近期学界关注量子语境性概念能否扩展至存在扰动或信号传递的系统,同时保留标准语境性的核心性质。Dzhafarov与Kujala(arXiv:2302.11995)提出了颇具争议的论证,认为答案始终是肯定的:若标准语境性满足某条扩展语境性不满足的原理,则该原理必然是“非实质性的”,因为它依赖于表层的表示选择。他们的论证基于一种“一致化”程序,该程序将所有系统映射为无扰动系统,且能保留语境性。本文对其论证提出了若干反驳,包括:该论证忽视了实质性原理在表示变换下会改变其表达形式;它通过预设原理基于非实质性变换而窃取论题;且该论证可普遍适用于语境性的任意扩展情形。

英文摘要:

There has been recent interest in whether the concept of quantum contextuality can be extended to systems with disturbance or signaling while retaining the essential properties of standard contextuality. Dzhafarov and Kujala (arXiv:2302.11995) offer a provocative argument that the answer is always affirmative: If standard contextuality satisfies some principle that extended contextuality does not, then that principle must be `non-substantive' in that it depends on a superficial choice of representation. Their argument is based on a ``consistification'' procedure that maps all systems to nondisturbing ones and that preserves contextuality. This paper raises several objections to their argument, including that it neglects how substantive principles change their expression under a change of representation, that it begs the question by presuming the principles are based on non-substantive transformations, and that the argument applies universally to arbitrary extensions of contextuality.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑