arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2410.03380cs.LGcs.AIq-bio.QM
收藏

通过因果差异网络识别生物扰动靶点

Identifying biological perturbation targets through causal differential networks

Menghua Wu, Umesh Padia, Sean H. Murphy, Regina Barzilay, Tommi Jaakkola

AI总结:

提出一种受因果启发的方法,通过联合训练含噪声因果图推断与差异映射模块,在低样本高维生物数据中准确识别干预靶点,在7个单细胞数据集及多种合成数据上显著优于基线方法。

摘要:

识别导致生物系统变化的变量,能够促进药物靶点发现和细胞工程等应用。给定一对观测数据集和干预数据集,目标是分离出作为干预靶点的观测变量子集。直接应用因果发现算法具有挑战性:数据可能包含数千个变量,而每次干预仅有数十个样本,且生物系统不遵循经典的因果假设。我们提出一种受因果启发的方法来解决这一实际场景。首先,我们从观测和干预数据中推断含噪声的因果图。然后,我们学习将这些图之间的差异及额外的统计特征映射到被干预的变量集合上。这两个模块在监督框架下联合训练,使用反映生物干预性质的模拟和真实数据。该方法在7个单细胞转录组学数据集上的扰动建模中始终优于基线方法。我们还证明,在多种合成数据上预测软干预和硬干预靶点时,该方法相比当前的因果发现方法有显著提升。

英文摘要:

Identifying variables responsible for changes to a biological system enables applications in drug target discovery and cell engineering. Given a pair of observational and interventional datasets, the goal is to isolate the subset of observed variables that were the targets of the intervention. Directly applying causal discovery algorithms is challenging: the data may contain thousands of variables with as few as tens of samples per intervention, and biological systems do not adhere to classical causality assumptions. We propose a causality-inspired approach to address this practical setting. First, we infer noisy causal graphs from the observational and interventional data. Then, we learn to map the differences between these graphs, along with additional statistical features, to sets of variables that were intervened upon. Both modules are jointly trained in a supervised framework, on simulated and real data that reflect the nature of biological interventions. This approach consistently outperforms baselines for perturbation modeling on seven single-cell transcriptomics datasets. We also demonstrate significant improvements over current causal discovery methods for predicting soft and hard intervention targets across a variety of synthetic data.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑