arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.11969cs.CV

揭开黑箱:鸟瞰感知模型的独立功能模块评估

Unveiling the Black Box: Independent Functional Module Evaluation for Bird's-Eye-View Perception Model

School of Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University(清华大学车辆与学院);State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Green Vehicle and Mobility, Tsinghua University(清华大学智能绿色车辆与交通全国重点实验室);School of Mathematical Sciences, Nankai University(南开大学数学科学学院);School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(北京航空航天大学电子信息工程学院)

Ludan Zhang, Xiaokang Ding, Yuqi Dai, Lei He, Keqiang Li

AI总结:

针对自动驾驶端到端BEV感知模型内部机制难以拆解的问题,提出BEV-IFME评估框架,通过两阶段对齐自编码器实现特征与真值的统一空间对齐,以相似度得分评估模块成熟度,与BEV指标平均相关系数达0.9387,具备高可靠性。

摘要:

端到端模型正逐渐成为自动驾驶感知领域的主流。然而,无法精细拆解其内部机制会导致开发效率下降,并阻碍信任的建立。作为该问题的开创性研究,我们提出了鸟瞰感知模型独立功能模块评估框架(BEV-IFME),这一新型框架将模块的特征图与真实标签(Ground Truth)置于统一的语义表示空间中进行比对,量化二者的相似度,以此评估各个功能模块的训练成熟度。该框架的核心在于特征图编码与表示对齐的过程,由我们提出的两阶段对齐自编码器(Alignment AutoEncoder)实现,可确保关键信息的保留与特征结构的一致性。用于评估功能模块训练成熟度的指标——相似度得分(Similarity Score),与BEV指标呈现出强正相关,平均相关系数达0.9387,证明了该评估框架的可靠性。

英文摘要:

End-to-end models are emerging as the mainstream in autonomous driving perception. However, the inability to meticulously deconstruct their internal mechanisms results in diminished development efficacy and impedes the establishment of trust. Pioneering in the issue, we present the Independent Functional Module Evaluation for Bird's-Eye-View Perception Model (BEV-IFME), a novel framework that juxtaposes the module's feature maps against Ground Truth within a unified semantic Representation Space to quantify their similarity, thereby assessing the training maturity of individual functional modules. The core of the framework lies in the process of feature map encoding and representation aligning, facilitated by our proposed two-stage Alignment AutoEncoder, which ensures the preservation of salient information and the consistency of feature structure. The metric for evaluating the training maturity of functional modules, Similarity Score, demonstrates a robust positive correlation with BEV metrics, with an average correlation coefficient of 0.9387, attesting to the framework's reliability for assessment purposes.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑