arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.11255math.NAcs.NA
收藏

GePUP-ES:带无滑移条件的不可压缩Navier-Stokes方程的高阶能量稳定投影方法

GePUP-ES: High-order Energy-stable Projection Methods for the Incompressible Navier-Stokes Equations with No-slip Conditions

Yang Li, Xu Wu, Jiatu Yan, Jiang Yang, Qinghai Zhang, Shubo Zhao

AI总结:

针对无滑移区域不可压缩Navier-Stokes方程数值求解问题,提出强形式的GePUP-E与GePUP-ES变体,开发对应半离散和四阶精度全离散算法,数值实验验证了理论分析的正确性。

摘要:

受无约束压力泊松方程(UPPE)公式[Liu, Liu, & Pego 2007 Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 60 pp. 1443]的启发,我们此前提出了GePUP公式[Zhang 2016 J. Sci. Comput., 67 pp. 1134],用于在无滑移区域上数值求解不可压缩Navier-Stokes方程(INSE)。本文提出GePUP-E和GePUP-ES,它们是GePUP的变体,具备以下特性:(a) 采用电边界条件,无需显式施加无穿透条件;(b) 与无滑移INSE等价;(c) 初始非螺线管速度的散度呈指数衰减;(d) 动能单调递减。与UPPE不同,GePUP-E和GePUP-ES公式为强形式,是为线法框架下的有限体积/有限差分方法设计的。此外,我们开发了能保持特性(c)和(d)的半离散算法,以及速度在时间和空间上均达到四阶精度的全离散算法。这些算法以黑盒方式使用代数稳定时间积分器,每个时间步仅需求解一系列线性方程。数值测试结果验证了我们的分析。

英文摘要:

Inspired by the unconstrained PPE (UPPE) formulation [Liu, Liu, & Pego 2007 Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 60 pp. 1443], we previously proposed the GePUP formulation [Zhang 2016 J. Sci. Comput., 67 pp. 1134] for numerically solving the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations (INSE) on no-slip domains. In this paper, we propose GePUP-E and GePUP-ES, variants of GePUP that feature (a) electric boundary conditions with no explicit enforcement of the no-penetration condition, (b) equivalence to the no-slip INSE, (c) exponential decay of the divergence of an initially non-solenoidal velocity, and (d) monotonic decrease of the kinetic energy. Different from UPPE, the GePUP-E and GePUP-ES formulations are of strong forms and are designed for finite volume/difference methods under the framework of method of lines. Furthermore, we develop semi-discrete algorithms that preserve (c) and (d) and fully discrete algorithms that are fourth-order accurate for velocity both in time and in space. These algorithms employ algebraically stable time integrators in a black-box manner and only consist of solving a sequence of linear equations in each time step. Results of numerical tests confirm our analysis.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑