arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.09501cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

Synthetic4Health:生成带标注的合成临床信函

Synthetic4Health: Generating Annotated Synthetic Clinical Letters

The University of Manchester(曼彻斯特大学)

Libo Ren, Samuel Belkadi, Lifeng Han, Warren Del-Pinto, Goran Nenadic

AI总结:

针对临床信函含敏感信息难以用于科研训练的问题,本研究基于Bio_ClinicalBERT探索不同掩码策略生成去标识化合成临床信函,验证了仅编码器模型的优势及合成信函在下游NER任务中的替代潜力。

摘要:

由于临床信函包含敏感信息,临床相关数据集无法广泛应用于模型训练、医学研究和教学。本研究旨在生成可靠、多样且去标识化的合成临床信函。为实现这一目标,我们探索了不同的预训练语言模型(PLMs)用于文本掩码与生成。随后,我们基于高性能模型Bio_ClinicalBERT开展研究,并针对不同掩码策略进行了实验。评估采用了定性与定量相结合的方法,此外还通过下游任务命名实体识别(NER)来评估这些合成信函的可用性。结果表明:1)仅编码器架构的模型表现优于编码器-解码器架构模型;2)在仅编码器模型中,当临床信息得以保留时,在通用语料上训练的模型与在临床数据上训练的模型表现相当;3)此外,保留临床实体与文档结构比单纯微调模型更契合我们的目标;4)不同的掩码策略会影响合成临床信函的质量,掩码停用词具有积极作用,而掩码名词或动词则会产生负面影响;5)评估方面,BERTScore应作为主要的定量评估指标,其他指标作为补充参考;6)上下文信息对模型的理解没有显著影响,因此合成临床信函在下游任务中具备替代原始信函的潜力。

英文摘要:

Since clinical letters contain sensitive information, clinical-related datasets can not be widely applied in model training, medical research, and teaching. This work aims to generate reliable, various, and de-identified synthetic clinical letters. To achieve this goal, we explored different pre-trained language models (PLMs) for masking and generating text. After that, we worked on Bio\_ClinicalBERT, a high-performing model, and experimented with different masking strategies. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were used for evaluation. Additionally, a downstream task, Named Entity Recognition (NER), was also implemented to assess the usability of these synthetic letters. The results indicate that 1) encoder-only models outperform encoder-decoder models. 2) Among encoder-only models, those trained on general corpora perform comparably to those trained on clinical data when clinical information is preserved. 3) Additionally, preserving clinical entities and document structure better aligns with our objectives than simply fine-tuning the model. 4) Furthermore, different masking strategies can impact the quality of synthetic clinical letters. Masking stopwords has a positive impact, while masking nouns or verbs has a negative effect. 5) For evaluation, BERTScore should be the primary quantitative evaluation metric, with other metrics serving as supplementary references. 6) Contextual information does not significantly impact the models' understanding, so the synthetic clinical letters have the potential to replace the original ones in downstream tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑