arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.08985cs.CRcs.LGeess.AS
收藏

针对SLU系统的干净标签攻击

Clean Label Attacks against SLU Systems

Johns Hopkins University(约翰斯·霍普金斯大学)

Henry Li Xinyuan, Sonal Joshi, Thomas Thebaud, Jesus Villalba, Najim Dehak, Sanjeev Khudanpur

AI总结:

本研究将干净标签后门投毒攻击适配于口语理解任务的语音识别模型,分析了多种因素对攻击效果的影响,发现针对难样本投毒仅需1.5%数据即可达99.3%成功率,且现有梯度类防御效果有限。

摘要:

投毒后门攻击指攻击者通过在推理阶段向信号中植入触发器,操纵训练数据以在受害模型中诱导特定行为的攻击方式。我们将不修改训练标签的干净标签后门(CLBD,Clean Label Backdoor)数据投毒攻击适配于支持/执行口语理解(Spoken Language Understanding,SLU)任务的最先进语音识别模型,通过投毒10%的训练数据实现了99.8%的攻击成功率。我们分析了投毒信号强度、投毒样本占比以及触发器选择的变化对攻击效果的影响。我们还发现,当CLBD攻击应用于对代理模型而言本身难以处理的训练样本时,攻击成功率最高。采用这一策略,我们仅投毒了少至1.5%的训练数据,就实现了99.3%的攻击成功率。最后,我们应用了两种先前开发的针对基于梯度的攻击的防御方法,发现它们对投毒攻击的防御效果好坏参半。

英文摘要:

Poisoning backdoor attacks involve an adversary manipulating the training data to induce certain behaviors in the victim model by inserting a trigger in the signal at inference time. We adapted clean label backdoor (CLBD)-data poisoning attacks, which do not modify the training labels, on state-of-the-art speech recognition models that support/perform a Spoken Language Understanding task, achieving 99.8% attack success rate by poisoning 10% of the training data. We analyzed how varying the signal-strength of the poison, percent of samples poisoned, and choice of trigger impact the attack. We also found that CLBD attacks are most successful when applied to training samples that are inherently hard for a proxy model. Using this strategy, we achieved an attack success rate of 99.3% by poisoning a meager 1.5% of the training data. Finally, we applied two previously developed defenses against gradient-based attacks, and found that they attain mixed success against poisoning.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑