arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.06982cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.dis-nn
收藏

GeO$_2$玻璃中程有序的比较:使用机器学习原子间势的分子动力学与基于实验数据的逆向蒙特卡洛拟合

Comparison of intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass: molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential vs.\ reverse Monte Carlo fitting to experimental data

Kenta Matsutani, Shusuke Kasamatsu, Takeshi Usuki

AI总结:

本文使用机器学习原子间势的分子动力学与逆向蒙特卡洛拟合比较了GeO$_2$玻璃的中程有序,发现尽管两体关联相似,但两者在环分布等三维短程和中程有序结构上存在显著差异,证明ab initio计算对网络组装的约束更严格。

摘要:

本文使用基于ab initio计算数据训练的机器学习原子间势,通过分子动力学研究了GeO$_2$玻璃的短程和中程有序,并将其与中子衍射数据的逆向蒙特卡洛(RMC)拟合结果进行了比较。为了表征各模型的结构差异,研究计算了全/偏结构因子、配位数、环尺寸与形状分布,并进行了持续同调分析。结果表明,尽管两种方法产生相似的两体关联,但它们会导致短程和中程有序截然不同的三维模型。特别是在环分布中观察到明显差异:RMC模型在环尺寸分布上呈现宽分布,而神经网络势分子动力学产生窄得多的环分布。这证实了ab initio计算中的密度泛函近似比带有简单配位约束和同位素取代中子衍射数据的RMC更严格地决定了优先的网络组装。

英文摘要:

The short and intermediate-range order in GeO$_2$ glass are investigated by molecular dynamics using machine-learning interatomic potential trained on ab initio calculation data and compared with reverse Monte Carlo fitting of neutron diffraction data. To characterize the structural differences in each model, the total/partial structure factors, coordination number, ring size and shape distributions, and persistent homology analysis were performed. These results show that although the two approaches yield similar two-body correlations, they can lead to three-dimensional models with very different short and intermediate-range ordering. A clear difference was observed especially in the ring distributions; RMC models exhibit a broad distribution in the ring size distribution, while neural network potential molecular dynamics yield much narrower ring distributions. This confirms that the density functional approximation in the ab initio calculations determines the preferred network assembly more strictly than RMC with simple coordination constraints and neutron diffraction data with isotope substitution.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑