arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
今晚才能更新了~~大家休息下再来吧
arXiv 2409.06348cs.SDcs.AIcs.CReess.AS
收藏

VoiceWukong:深度伪造语音检测基准评测

VoiceWukong: Benchmarking Deepfake Voice Detection

Huazhong University of Science and Technology(华中科技大学)

Ziwei Yan, Yanjie Zhao, Haoyu Wang

AI总结:

本文提出 VoiceWukong 深度伪造语音检测基准,覆盖多语言、多工具与六类操纵,评测12种检测器、人类及 Qwen2-Audio,揭示现有方法在真实场景中的显著局限。

摘要:

随着文本转语音(TTS)和语音转换(VC)等技术的快速发展,检测深度伪造语音变得愈发关键。然而,学术界和产业界都缺乏一个全面、直观的基准来评估检测器。现有数据集在语言多样性方面存在局限,并且缺少现实生产环境中遇到的多种操纵方式。为填补这一空白,我们提出 VoiceWukong,这是一个旨在评估深度伪造语音检测器性能的基准。为构建数据集,我们首先收集了由19种先进且广受认可的商业工具和15种开源工具生成的深度伪造语音。随后,我们创建了覆盖六类操纵方式的38个数据变体,构建了深度伪造语音检测评估数据集。因此,VoiceWukong 包含265,200条英文和148,200条中文深度伪造语音样本。利用 VoiceWukong,我们评估了12种最先进的检测器。AASIST2 取得了13.50%的最佳等错误率(EER),而其他所有检测器的 EER 均超过20%。我们的发现表明,这些检测器在现实应用中面临重大挑战,性能会急剧下降。此外,我们开展了一项有300多名参与者的用户研究。研究结果与12种检测器以及多模态大语言模型(MLLM)Qwen2-Audio 的性能进行了比较:不同检测器和人类在不同欺骗级别下对深度伪造语音表现出不同的识别能力,而该 LALM 完全没有展现出检测能力。此外,我们提供了深度伪造语音检测排行榜,公开发布于 {https://voicewukong.github.io}。

英文摘要:

With the rapid advancement of technologies like text-to-speech (TTS) and voice conversion (VC), detecting deepfake voices has become increasingly crucial. However, both academia and industry lack a comprehensive and intuitive benchmark for evaluating detectors. Existing datasets are limited in language diversity and lack many manipulations encountered in real-world production environments. To fill this gap, we propose VoiceWukong, a benchmark designed to evaluate the performance of deepfake voice detectors. To build the dataset, we first collected deepfake voices generated by 19 advanced and widely recognized commercial tools and 15 open-source tools. We then created 38 data variants covering six types of manipulations, constructing the evaluation dataset for deepfake voice detection. VoiceWukong thus includes 265,200 English and 148,200 Chinese deepfake voice samples. Using VoiceWukong, we evaluated 12 state-of-the-art detectors. AASIST2 achieved the best equal error rate (EER) of 13.50%, while all others exceeded 20%. Our findings reveal that these detectors face significant challenges in real-world applications, with dramatically declining performance. In addition, we conducted a user study with more than 300 participants. The results are compared with the performance of the 12 detectors and a multimodel large language model (MLLM), i.e., Qwen2-Audio, where different detectors and humans exhibit varying identification capabilities for deepfake voices at different deception levels, while the LALM demonstrates no detection ability at all. Furthermore, we provide a leaderboard for deepfake voice detection, publicly available at {https://voicewukong.github.io}.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑