arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.03255astro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
收藏

询问快速射电暴超越再电离历史的信息

Asking Fast Radio Bursts for More than Reionization History

Abinash Kumar Shaw, Raghunath Ghara, Paz Beniamini, Saleem Zaroubi, Pawan Kumar

AI总结:

本文提出利用快速射电暴色散量的方差探测再电离历史,发现方差编码了电离气泡大小与再电离持续时间信息,并通过模拟验证了其有效性。

摘要:

我们提出了不同的估计量,利用快速射电暴的色散量(${\rm DM}$)来探测再电离纪元(EoR)期间的星系际介质(IGM)。我们考虑了三种不同的再电离历史,如果它们的红移已知,我们可以通过EoR期间总共$\lesssim 1000$次${\rm DM}$测量来区分它们。我们注意到${\rm DM}$的红移导数也直接对再电离历史敏感。这项工作的主要重点是探索${\rm DM}$测量中的方差及其编码的信息。我们发现全天平均$\overline{\rm DM}(z)$会因EoR期间IGM电离引入的${\rm DM}$测量中的视线(LoS)波动而产生偏差。我们发现比率$σ_{\rm DM}/\overline{\rm DM}$直接依赖于电离气泡大小以及再电离历史。另一方面,我们还发现${\rm DM}$的角方差(称为$\textit{结构函数}$)也编码了关于再电离持续时间和典型气泡大小的信息。我们使用再电离的玩具模型确立了${\rm DM}$中方差的实用性,并随后用真实的再电离模拟对其进行了验证。

英文摘要:

We propose different estimators to probe the intergalactic medium (IGM) during epoch of reionization (EoR) using the dispersion measure (${\rm DM}$) of the fast radio bursts. We consider three different reionization histories, which we can distinguish with a total of $\lesssim 1000\,{\rm DM}$ measurements during EoR if their redshifts are known. We note that the redshift derivatives of ${\rm DM}$ are also directly sensitive to the reionization history. The major point of this work is to explore the variance in the ${\rm DM}$ measurements and the information encoded in them. We find that the all-sky average $\overline{\rm DM}(z)$ gets biased from the line-of-sight (LoS) fluctuations in the ${\rm DM}$ measurements introduced by the ionization of IGM during EoR. We find that the ratio $σ_{\rm DM}/\overline{\rm DM}$ depends directly on the ionization bubble sizes as well as the reionization history. On the other hand, we also find that angular variance (coined as $\textit{structure function}$) of ${\rm DM}$ encodes the information about the duration of reionization and the typical bubble sizes as well. We establish the usefulness of variances in ${\rm DM}$ using toy models of reionization and later verify it with the realistic reionization simulations.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑