arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.02567cs.CV

SAM 2 用于类别无关实例级分割的评估研究

Evaluation Study on SAM 2 for Class-agnostic Instance-level Segmentation

The Chinese University of Hong Kong(香港中文大学);Huazhong University of Science and Technology(华中科技大学)

Jialun Pei, Zhangjun Zhou, Tiantian Zhang

AI总结:

本文通过多种提示策略在 SIS、CIS、SID 及高分辨率 DIS 基准上评估 SAM2 的类别无关实例级分割能力,发现其性能随场景显著变化且对精细细节不敏感。

摘要:

Segment Anything Model(SAM)已在自然场景中展示出强大的零样本分割性能。最近发布的 Segment Anything Model 2(SAM2)进一步提高了研究人员对图像分割能力的期望。为评估 SAM2 在类别无关实例级分割任务上的性能,我们针对 SAM2 采用不同的提示策略,以应对三个相关场景的实例级任务:显著实例分割(SIS)、伪装实例分割(CIS)和阴影实例检测(SID)。此外,为进一步探究 SAM2 在分割精细物体结构方面的有效性,我们还在高分辨率二分图像分割(DIS)基准上进行了详细测试,以评估其细粒度分割能力。定性和定量实验结果表明,SAM2 的性能在不同场景之间存在显著差异。此外,SAM2 对分割高分辨率精细细节并不特别敏感。我们希望本技术报告能够推动基于 SAM2 的适配器出现,旨在提升大型视觉模型在类别无关实例分割任务上的性能上限。

英文摘要:

Segment Anything Model (SAM) has demonstrated powerful zero-shot segmentation performance in natural scenes. The recently released Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM2) has further heightened researchers' expectations towards image segmentation capabilities. To evaluate the performance of SAM2 on class-agnostic instance-level segmentation tasks, we adopt different prompt strategies for SAM2 to cope with instance-level tasks for three relevant scenarios: Salient Instance Segmentation (SIS), Camouflaged Instance Segmentation (CIS), and Shadow Instance Detection (SID). In addition, to further explore the effectiveness of SAM2 in segmenting granular object structures, we also conduct detailed tests on the high-resolution Dichotomous Image Segmentation (DIS) benchmark to assess the fine-grained segmentation capability. Qualitative and quantitative experimental results indicate that the performance of SAM2 varies significantly across different scenarios. Besides, SAM2 is not particularly sensitive to segmenting high-resolution fine details. We hope this technique report can drive the emergence of SAM2-based adapters, aiming to enhance the performance ceiling of large vision models on class-agnostic instance segmentation tasks.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑