arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2409.02438cs.CV

非目标发散假说:理解跨模态知识蒸馏中的域差距

Non-target Divergence Hypothesis: Toward Understanding Domain Gaps in Cross-Modal Knowledge Distillation

Yilong Chen, Zongyi Xu, Xiaoshui Huang, Shanshan Zhao, Xinqi Jiang, Xinyu Gao, Xinbo Gao

AI总结:

本文提出非目标发散假说(NTDH),揭示模态间域差距通过非目标类别分布差异影响跨模态知识蒸馏性能,并基于VC理论推导误差上下界,在五个数据集上验证了该假说的有效性。

摘要:

与单模态知识蒸馏相比,跨模态知识蒸馏由于模态之间的域差距而面临更严峻的挑战。尽管各种方法已经提出了多种解决方案来克服这些挑战,但关于域差距如何影响跨模态知识蒸馏的研究仍然有限。本文对这一问题进行了深入的分析和评估。我们首先提出非目标发散假说(NTDH),以揭示域差距对跨模态知识蒸馏的影响。我们的关键发现是,模态之间的域差距会导致非目标类别的分布差异,而这些差异越小,跨模态知识蒸馏的性能越好。随后,基于Vapnik-Chervonenkis(VC)理论,我们推导出跨模态知识蒸馏近似误差的上界和下界,从而在理论上验证了NTDH。最后,在五个跨模态数据集上的实验进一步证实了NTDH的有效性、泛化性和适用性。

英文摘要:

Compared to single-modal knowledge distillation, cross-modal knowledge distillation faces more severe challenges due to domain gaps between modalities. Although various methods have proposed various solutions to overcome these challenges, there is still limited research on how domain gaps affect cross-modal knowledge distillation. This paper provides an in-depth analysis and evaluation of this issue. We first introduce the Non-Target Divergence Hypothesis (NTDH) to reveal the impact of domain gaps on cross-modal knowledge distillation. Our key finding is that domain gaps between modalities lead to distribution differences in non-target classes, and the smaller these differences, the better the performance of cross-modal knowledge distillation. Subsequently, based on Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) theory, we derive the upper and lower bounds of the approximation error for cross-modal knowledge distillation, thereby theoretically validating the NTDH. Finally, experiments on five cross-modal datasets further confirm the validity, generalisability, and applicability of the NTDH.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑