arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.02433cs.SE

从文献到实践:探索面向软件行业采用的公平性测试工具

From Literature to Practice: Exploring Fairness Testing Tools for the Software Industry Adoption

Thanh Nguyen, Luiz Fernando de Lima, Maria Teresa Badassarre, Ronnie de Souza Santos

AI总结:

本文通过考察现有软件公平性测试工具的实用性,发现其存在易用性差、文档不足和数据类型受限等问题,并提出新工具应具备用户友好、文档完善和灵活处理多种数据的能力,以帮助开发者在早期识别并修正偏见。

摘要:

在当今世界,我们需要确保人工智能系统是公平且无偏见的。我们的研究考察了旨在测试软件公平性的工具,以判断它们对软件开发者而言是否实用且易于使用。我们发现,虽然一些工具具有成本效益并能兼容多种编程环境,但许多工具难以使用且缺乏详细说明。它们还倾向于关注特定类型的数据,这限制了它们在现实场景中的有用性。总体而言,当前的公平性测试工具需要重大改进,以更好地支持软件开发者创造公平且公正的技术。我们建议新工具应当用户友好、文档完善,并且足够灵活以处理不同类型的数据,从而帮助开发者在开发过程中尽早识别并修正偏见。这将为所有人带来更值得信赖且更公平的软件。

英文摘要:

In today's world, we need to ensure that AI systems are fair and unbiased. Our study looked at tools designed to test the fairness of software to see if they are practical and easy for software developers to use. We found that while some tools are cost-effective and compatible with various programming environments, many are hard to use and lack detailed instructions. They also tend to focus on specific types of data, which limits their usefulness in real-world situations. Overall, current fairness testing tools need significant improvements to better support software developers in creating fair and equitable technology. We suggest that new tools should be user-friendly, well-documented, and flexible enough to handle different kinds of data, helping developers identify and fix biases early in the development process. This will lead to more trustworthy and fair software for everyone.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑