arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2409.00538eess.SYcs.SY
收藏

综述用于自动电压调节器PID控制器参数整定的元启发式优化算法

Review of meta-heuristic optimization algorithms to tune the PID controller parameters for automatic voltage regulator

Md. Rayid Hasan Mojumder, Naruttam Kumar Roy

AI总结:

本文系统综述了用于自动电压调节器PID控制器参数整定的元启发式优化算法,比较了ITSE、ITAE、IAE、ISE和ZLG等目标函数下的PID增益范围及性能差异,为后续新算法研究提供指导。

摘要:

比例-积分-微分(PID)控制器需要在系统受到扰动或出现偏差后,尽快将系统带回稳定运行区域。为了使PID控制器成功运行,必须以一种能够实现较低优化复杂度、较少运行内存、快速收敛并具备动态运行能力的方式来设计控制器参数。近年来的研究提出了许多不同的元启发式算法,用于在各种系统环境下高效整定PID控制器。然而,研究者在提出新的算法方法时,很少将自己定制的目标函数与先前的研究进行比较。本文重点详细研究了最近提出的用于自动电压调节器(AVR)系统PID控制器参数设计与整定的启发式算法的研究进展、不足、成果和未来发展方向。考虑了包括ITSE、ITAE、IAE、ISE和ZLG在内的目标函数,以枚举算法的可测量结果。考虑到算法系统增益参数的轻微变化,采用ITSE观测到的PID增益结果为:K_p为0.81918 - 1.9499,K_i为0.24366 - 1.4608,K_d为0.31840 - 0.9683。而采用ITAE时,相应值分别为0.24420 - 1.2771、0.14230 - 0.8471和0.04270 - 0.4775。时域和频域特性也随每个目标函数发生显著变化。我们所概述的比较将为该领域任何新算法的研究提供指导。

英文摘要:

A Proportional- Integral- Derivative (PID) controller is required to bring a system back to the stable operating region as soon as possible following a disturbance or discrepancy. For successful operation of the PID controller, it is necessary to design the controller parameters in a manner that will render low optimization complexity, less memory for operation, fast convergence, and should be able to operate dynamically. Recent investigations have postulated many different meta-heuristic algorithms for efficient tuning of PID controller under various system milieus. However, researchers have seldom compared their custom made objective functions with previous investigations while proposing new algorithmic methods. This paper focuses on a detailed study on the research progress, deficiency, accomplishment and future scopes of recently proposed heuristic algorithms to designing and tuning the PID controller parameters for an automatic voltage regulator (AVR) system. Objective functions, including ITSE, ITAE, IAE, ISE, and ZLG, are considered to enumerate a measurable outcome of the algorithms. Considering a slight variation in the sytem gain parameters of the algorithms, the observed PID gain with ITSE results in 0.81918 - 1.9499 for K_p, 0.24366 - 1.4608 for K_i, and 0.31840 - 0.9683 for K_d. Whereas with ITAE the values are 0.24420 - 1.2771, 0.14230 - 0.8471, and 0.04270 - 0.4775, respectively. The time domain and frequency domain characteristics also changes significantly with each objective function. Our outlined comparison will be a guideline for investigating any newer algorithms in the field.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑