arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.04771cs.CYcs.AI
收藏

AI意识与公众认知:四种未来

AI Consciousness and Public Perceptions: Four Futures

UC Berkeley(加州大学伯克利分校)

Ines Fernandez, Nicoleta Kyosovska, Jay Luong, Gabriel Mukobi

AI总结:

本文构建AI是否真有意识与社会是否相信其有意识的二维四情景框架,评估AI痛苦、人类失权等地缘与道德风险,建议勿刻意创造有意识AI并降低相关不确定性。

摘要:

关于先进AI系统(“AIs”)风险的讨论通常聚焦于滥用、事故和失控,但AI的道德地位问题可能产生具有同等重要性的负面影响,并且可能在相似的时间范围内成为现实。本文通过研究两个问题来评估这些影响:(1)未来的先进AI系统是否会具有意识这一事实问题,以及(2)未来人类社会是否会广泛相信先进AI系统具有意识这一认知问题。假设对(1)和(2)作出二元回答,便产生四种可能性:在真阳性情景中,社会主流正确地相信AI具有意识;在假阳性情景中,这种信念是错误的;在真阴性情景中,社会正确地相信AI不具有意识;最后,在假阴性情景中,社会错误地相信AI不具有意识。本文提供了不同未来的生动场景片段,以为这一二维框架提供现实基础。关键在于,我们识别出四大风险:AI痛苦、人类失权、地缘政治不稳定以及人类堕落。我们在不同情景中评估每一种风险,并为每种情景提供总体定性风险评估。我们的分析表明,最糟糕的可能性是错误地相信AI不具有意识,其次是错误地相信AI具有意识。本文最后提出主要建议:避免开展旨在有意创造有意识AI的研究,转而集中精力减少我们当前在AI意识的事实问题和认知问题上的不确定性。

英文摘要:

The discourse on risks from advanced AI systems ("AIs") typically focuses on misuse, accidents and loss of control, but the question of AIs' moral status could have negative impacts which are of comparable significance and could be realised within similar timeframes. Our paper evaluates these impacts by investigating (1) the factual question of whether future advanced AI systems will be conscious, together with (2) the epistemic question of whether future human society will broadly believe advanced AI systems to be conscious. Assuming binary responses to (1) and (2) gives rise to four possibilities: in the true positive scenario, society predominantly correctly believes that AIs are conscious; in the false positive scenario, that belief is incorrect; in the true negative scenario, society correctly believes that AIs are not conscious; and lastly, in the false negative scenario, society incorrectly believes that AIs are not conscious. The paper offers vivid vignettes of the different futures to ground the two-dimensional framework. Critically, we identify four major risks: AI suffering, human disempowerment, geopolitical instability, and human depravity. We evaluate each risk across the different scenarios and provide an overall qualitative risk assessment for each scenario. Our analysis suggests that the worst possibility is the wrong belief that AI is non-conscious, followed by the wrong belief that AI is conscious. The paper concludes with the main recommendations to avoid research aimed at intentionally creating conscious AI and instead focus efforts on reducing our current uncertainties on both the factual and epistemic questions on AI consciousness.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑