arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2408.04432astro-ph.CO
收藏

SDSS 与 DESI BAO 测量之间的一致性检验

Consistency tests between SDSS and DESI BAO measurements

Basundhara Ghosh, Carlos Bengaly

AI总结:

本文通过非参数重构 H(z) 与 q(z),检验 SDSS 与 DESI 的 BAO 测量,发现二者显著不一致且均仅与 ΛCDM 边缘相符,但合并数据强烈支持标准模型。

摘要:

在本工作中,我们研究来自红移巡天的重子声学振荡(BAO)测量,如斯隆数字巡天(SDSS)和暗能量光谱仪(DESI)的测量,是否彼此一致。为此,我们采用非参数重构从两个数据集中分别获得哈勃参数和减速参数,即 H(z) 和 q(z),从而使我们的结果不依赖于关于底层宇宙学模型的任何先验假设。我们发现,由 SDSS 重构的 H(z) 和 q(z) 与由 DESI 得到的结果显著不一致,而且两者都仅与 ΛCDM 模型边缘一致(约 3σ 置信水平)。有趣的是,SDSS 与 DESI 的合并数据集与标准模型相协调。对于声视界尺度值的不同假设以及不同的重构核,这些结果基本保持不变。我们还检验了零诊断量 O_m(z) 的结果,发现它们表明使用 DESI 和 SDSS BAO 测量的暗能量模型具有不同趋势,而合并数据集再次与 ΛCDM 强烈一致。因此,我们的结果提醒人们进一步审查这种不一致,因为它们可能导致关于标准模型有效性的有偏且分歧的结果,或暗示新物理。

英文摘要:

In this work, we investigate whether the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements from redshift surveys, like the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), are consistent with each other. We do so by obtaining the Hubble and deceleration parameter, respectively $H(z)$ and $q(z)$, from both datasets using a non-parametric reconstruction, so that our results do not depend on any $\textit{a priori}$ assumptions about the underlying cosmological model. We find that the reconstructed $H(z)$ and $q(z)$ from SDSS are significantly inconsistent with those obtained from DESI, and that both are only marginally consistent with the $Λ$CDM model ($\sim 3σ$ confidence level). Interestingly, the combined SDSS and DESI dataset reconciles with the standard model. These results are mostly unchanged with respect to different assumptions on the sound horizon scale value, as well as different reconstruction kernels. We also verify the results for the null diagnostic $\mathcal{O}_{\rm m}(z)$, finding that they suggest different trends for dark energy models using DESI and SDSS BAO measurements, and once again the combined dataset strongly agrees with $Λ$CDM. Therefore, our results call the attention for further examination of such inconsistency, as they can lead to biased and divergent results regarding the validity of the standard model, or the suggestion of new physics.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑