arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2408.01765cs.LGcs.ITmath.IT
收藏

无线时间触发联邦学习的联合模型剪枝与资源分配

Joint Model Pruning and Resource Allocation for Wireless Time-triggered Federated Learning

Department of Engineering, King’s College London(伦敦国王学院工程系)

Xinlu Zhang, Yansha Deng, Toktam Mahmoodi

AI总结:

本文针对无线时间触发联邦学习中的设备增长与带宽受限问题,提出联合优化模型剪枝比例与带宽分配的方法,通过收敛性分析推导闭式解,实现通信成本降低40%且保持收敛性能。

摘要:

时间触发联邦学习与传统的基于事件的联邦学习不同,它根据固定的时间间隔将用户组织成不同层级。然而,由于设备数量不断增加和无线带宽有限,这种网络仍然面临挑战,例如掉队者问题和通信开销日益加剧。在本文中,我们将模型剪枝应用于无线时间触发系统,并联合研究优化剪枝比例和带宽分配的问题,以在通信延迟约束下最小化训练损失。为了解决这一联合优化问题,我们对具有自适应模型剪枝的异步多层联邦学习模型的梯度 $l_2$-范数进行了收敛性分析。推导出收敛上界,并定义了剪枝比例与无线带宽的联合优化问题,以在给定通信延迟约束下最小化模型训练损失。随后,利用KKT条件给出了无线带宽和剪枝比例的闭式解。仿真实验表明,与未进行模型剪枝的异步多层联邦学习相比,我们提出的TT-Prune在保持模型收敛水平相同的情况下,通信成本降低了40%。

英文摘要:

Time-triggered federated learning, in contrast to conventional event-based federated learning, organizes users into tiers based on fixed time intervals. However, this network still faces challenges due to a growing number of devices and limited wireless bandwidth, increasing issues like stragglers and communication overhead. In this paper, we apply model pruning to wireless Time-triggered systems and jointly study the problem of optimizing the pruning ratio and bandwidth allocation to minimize training loss under communication latency constraints. To solve this joint optimization problem, we perform a convergence analysis on the gradient $l_2$-norm of the asynchronous multi-tier federated learning (FL) model with adaptive model pruning. The convergence upper bound is derived and a joint optimization problem of pruning ratio and wireless bandwidth is defined to minimize the model training loss under a given communication latency constraint. The closed-form solutions for wireless bandwidth and pruning ratio by using KKT conditions are then formulated. As indicated in the simulation experiments, our proposed TT-Prune demonstrates a 40% reduction in communication cost, compared with the asynchronous multi-tier FL without model pruning, while maintaining the model convergence at the same level.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑