arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2304.09876cs.LG

模型剪枝实现面向产量预测与数据共享的本地化高效联邦学习

Model Pruning Enables Localized and Efficient Federated Learning for Yield Forecasting and Data Sharing

University of Aberdeen(阿伯丁大学)

Andy Li, Milan Markovic, Peter Edwards, Georgios Leontidis

AI总结:

针对传统联邦学习在农业食品领域存在的数据异构导致全局模型适配性差、通信成本与模型规模大的问题,提出客户端模型剪枝后聚合的方案,在大豆产量预测任务上实现性能提升与模型、通信开销降低。

摘要:

联邦学习(Federated Learning, FL)为农业食品领域提供了一种去中心化的模型训练方式,有望在提升机器学习性能的同时,保障个体农场或数据孤岛的安全与隐私。但传统联邦学习方法存在两大局限:其一,各数据孤岛的异构数据会导致全局模型仅对部分客户表现良好,而非适配所有客户——因为部分客户的更新方向在聚合后可能对其他客户的模型效果造成阻碍;其二,该方法在效率层面存在不足,体现在联邦学习过程中的通信成本与模型规模过大两方面。本文提出一种新技术方案:在客户端模型上应用网络剪枝,再对剪枝后的模型进行聚合。该方法能让本地模型适配各自的数据分布,缓解农业食品数据中存在的数据异构性问题,同时还能得到更紧凑的模型,降低传输过程中的数据消耗量。我们在大豆产量预测数据集上开展实验,结果表明,与FedAvg相比,该方法可将推理性能提升15.5%至20%,同时本地模型规模最多缩减84%,客户端与服务器间的通信数据量减少57.1%至64.7%。

英文摘要:

Federated Learning (FL) presents a decentralized approach to model training in the agri-food sector and offers the potential for improved machine learning performance, while ensuring the safety and privacy of individual farms or data silos. However, the conventional FL approach has two major limitations. First, the heterogeneous data on individual silos can cause the global model to perform well for some clients but not all, as the update direction on some clients may hinder others after they are aggregated. Second, it is lacking with respect to the efficiency perspective concerning communication costs during FL and large model sizes. This paper proposes a new technical solution that utilizes network pruning on client models and aggregates the pruned models. This method enables local models to be tailored to their respective data distribution and mitigate the data heterogeneity present in agri-food data. Moreover, it allows for more compact models that consume less data during transmission. We experiment with a soybean yield forecasting dataset and find that this approach can improve inference performance by 15.5% to 20% compared to FedAvg, while reducing local model sizes by up to 84% and the data volume communicated between the clients and the server by 57.1% to 64.7%.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑