arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.12974gr-qcastro-ph.HEphysics.data-an
收藏

引力透镜的假阳性:引力波视角

False positives for gravitational lensing: the gravitational-wave perspective

David Keitel

AI总结:

本文从引力波视角探讨了透镜搜索中的假阳性问题,分析了参数相似性、波形简并性及探测器故障等成因,并综述了社区采取的主要缓解策略。

摘要:

对于首次探测到一种新颖的天体物理现象,科学标准尤为严格。特别是在多信使背景下,对任何探测声明进行后续观测也存在机会成本。因此,在寻找仍然难以捉摸的透镜引力波时,必须谨慎控制假阳性。特别是,许多识别强透镜的方法依赖于某种形式的参数相似性或波形一致性,在目录规模迅速扩大的情况下,如果不采取适当的措施,它们可能会面临来自巧合但非透镜事件的假阳性。此外,在所有透镜区域中搜索波形变形都受到简并性的影响,我们需要在透镜、内禀参数、建模不足的效应(如轨道偏心率)甚至广义相对论的偏差之间加以缓解。稳健的透镜研究还需要理解和缓解探测器数据中的故障和非平稳性。本文回顾了引力波透镜搜索中可能的假阳性来源(及其反面:假阴性)以及社区正在采取的缓解它们的主要方法。

英文摘要:

For the first detection of a novel astrophysical phenomenon, scientific standards are particularly high. Especially in a multi-messenger context, there are also opportunity costs to follow-up observations on any detection claims. So in searching for the still elusive lensed gravitational waves, care needs to be taken in controlling false positives. In particular, many methods for identifying strong lensing rely on some form of parameter similarity or waveform consistency, which under rapidly growing catalog sizes can expose them to false positives from coincident but unlensed events if proper care is not taken. And searches for waveform deformations in all lensing regimes are subject to degeneracies we need to mitigate between lensing, intrinsic parameters, insufficiently modelled effects such as orbital eccentricity, or even deviations from general relativity. Robust lensing studies also require understanding and mitigating glitches and non-stationarities in the detector data. This article reviews sources of possible false positives (and their flip side: false negatives) in gravitational-wave lensing searches and the main approaches the community is pursuing to mitigate them.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑