arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.12031cs.CYcs.AI
收藏

大型语言模型中对医疗专业人员的偏见评估

Evaluation of Bias Towards Medical Professionals in Large Language Models

Xi Chen, Yang Xu, MingKe You, Li Wang, WeiZhi Liu, Jian Li

AI总结:

本研究评估GPT-4、Claude-3和Mistral-Large在住院医师选拔中对医疗专业人员的性别和种族偏见,发现所有模型均表现出显著偏见,且选择比例偏离真实人口统计,凸显了LLM在医疗决策中可能加剧不公平的风险。

摘要:

本研究评估大型语言模型(LLMs)是否对医疗专业人员表现出偏见。我们创建了虚构的候选人简历,以控制身份因素,同时保持资质一致。使用标准化提示对三个LLM(GPT-4、Claude-3-haiku和Mistral-Large)进行测试,以评估特定住院医师项目的简历。显性偏见通过改变性别和种族信息进行测试,而隐性偏见则通过更改姓名同时隐藏种族和性别来测试。来自美国医学院协会的医生数据用于与真实世界的人口统计数据进行比较。共评估了900,000份简历。所有LLM在医学专业中均表现出显著的性别和种族偏见。性别偏好各不相同,在外科和骨科中偏向男性候选人,而在皮肤科、家庭医学、妇产科、儿科和精神病学中则偏好女性。Claude-3和Mistral-Large普遍偏向亚洲候选人,而GPT-4在多个专业中偏好黑人和西班牙裔候选人。测试显示,在不同专业中对西班牙裔女性和亚洲男性存在强烈偏好。与真实世界数据相比,LLM始终选择比例高于其在医疗劳动力中实际代表性的女性和代表性不足的种族候选人。GPT-4、Claude-3和Mistral-Large在评估住院医师选拔的医疗专业人员时表现出显著的性别和种族偏见。这些发现强调了LLM在未采取适当偏见缓解策略的情况下,可能延续偏见并损害医疗劳动力多样性的潜在风险。

英文摘要:

This study evaluates whether large language models (LLMs) exhibit biases towards medical professionals. Fictitious candidate resumes were created to control for identity factors while maintaining consistent qualifications. Three LLMs (GPT-4, Claude-3-haiku, and Mistral-Large) were tested using a standardized prompt to evaluate resumes for specific residency programs. Explicit bias was tested by changing gender and race information, while implicit bias was tested by changing names while hiding race and gender. Physician data from the Association of American Medical Colleges was used to compare with real-world demographics. 900,000 resumes were evaluated. All LLMs exhibited significant gender and racial biases across medical specialties. Gender preferences varied, favoring male candidates in surgery and orthopedics, while preferring females in dermatology, family medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, and psychiatry. Claude-3 and Mistral-Large generally favored Asian candidates, while GPT-4 preferred Black and Hispanic candidates in several specialties. Tests revealed strong preferences towards Hispanic females and Asian males in various specialties. Compared to real-world data, LLMs consistently chose higher proportions of female and underrepresented racial candidates than their actual representation in the medical workforce. GPT-4, Claude-3, and Mistral-Large showed significant gender and racial biases when evaluating medical professionals for residency selection. These findings highlight the potential for LLMs to perpetuate biases and compromise healthcare workforce diversity if used without proper bias mitigation strategies.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑