ChatGPT与疫苗犹豫：使用经验证量表对英语、西班牙语和法语回答的比较
ChatGPT and Vaccine Hesitancy: A Comparison of English, Spanish, and French Responses Using a Validated Scale
AI总结：
本研究采用VHS疫苗犹豫量表，对比ChatGPT英、西、法三种语言回答的疫苗犹豫程度，发现其犹豫度低于人类、语言间差异显著、参数下基本一致但维度有差异，为健康网络信息的质量与公平性优化提供参考。
摘要：
ChatGPT是一款热门信息系统（2023年8月访问量超10亿次），可针对用户查询生成自然语言回答。研究其在疫苗等健康相关主题上回答的质量与公平性十分重要，因为这些回答可能影响公共卫生决策。我们采用Shapiro等人提出的Vaccine Hesitancy Scale（VHS，疫苗犹豫量表），衡量ChatGPT英语、西班牙语和法语回答的犹豫程度。研究发现：(a) ChatGPT的回答显示出的犹豫程度低于以往文献中人类受访者的报告水平；(b) ChatGPT的回答在不同语言间存在显著差异，英语回答平均犹豫程度最高，西班牙语最低；(c) ChatGPT的回答在不同模型参数下基本一致，但在量表维度（疫苗效力、风险）上存在一定差异。研究结果对致力于评估和改善健康类网络信息质量与公平性的研究者具有启示意义。
英文摘要：
ChatGPT is a popular information system (over 1 billion visits in August 2023) that can generate natural language responses to user queries. It is important to study the quality and equity of its responses on health-related topics, such as vaccination, as they may influence public health decision-making. We use the Vaccine Hesitancy Scale (VHS) proposed by Shapiro et al.1 to measure the hesitancy of ChatGPT responses in English, Spanish, and French. We find that: (a) ChatGPT responses indicate less hesitancy than those reported for human respondents in past literature; (b) ChatGPT responses vary significantly across languages, with English responses being the most hesitant on average and Spanish being the least; (c) ChatGPT responses are largely consistent across different model parameters but show some variations across the scale factors (vaccine competency, risk). Results have implications for researchers interested in evaluating and improving the quality and equity of health-related web information.
机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来，可能存在错误，请以论文正文为准。
