arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.05022cs.CL
收藏

一个用于在类型学多样语言上进行评估的原则性框架

A Principled Framework for Evaluating on Typologically Diverse Languages

Aalborg University(奥胡斯大学);KU Leuven(库勒芬大学);Aalborg University Department of Computer Science(奥胡斯大学计算机科学系);KU Leuven Department of Computer Science(库勒芬大学计算机科学系)

Esther Ploeger, Wessel Poelman, Andreas Holck Høeg-Petersen, Anders Schlichtkrull, Miryam de Lhoneux, Johannes Bjerva

AI总结:

本文提出一个基于语言类型学的语言抽样框架,用于选择高度类型学多样的语言,以提高多语言NLP模型评估的泛化性,并通过指标比较证明其优于现有方法。

摘要:

超越个体语言,多语言自然语言处理(NLP)研究日益旨在开发能够普遍跨语言表现良好的模型。然而,在世界上所有语言上评估这些系统实际上是不可行的。为了获得泛化性,代表性语言抽样至关重要。先前的工作认为,可泛化的多语言评估集应包含具有多样类型学属性的语言。然而,研究发现“类型学多样”的语言样本在这方面差异显著,且流行的抽样方法存在缺陷且不一致。我们提出了一个语言抽样框架,用于在给定抽样框架下,依据语言类型学,选择高度类型学多样的语言。我们使用一系列指标比较了抽样方法,并发现我们的系统方法在检索比NLP中先前方法更类型学多样的语言选择方面始终更有效。此外,我们提供了证据表明这影响多语言模型评估中的泛化性,强调了在NLP评估中多样语言抽样的重要性。

英文摘要:

Beyond individual languages, multilingual natural language processing (NLP) research increasingly aims to develop models that perform well across languages generally. However, evaluating these systems on all the world's languages is practically infeasible. To attain generalizability, representative language sampling is essential. Previous work argues that generalizable multilingual evaluation sets should contain languages with diverse typological properties. However, 'typologically diverse' language samples have been found to vary considerably in this regard, and popular sampling methods are flawed and inconsistent. We present a language sampling framework for selecting highly typologically diverse languages given a sampling frame, informed by language typology. We compare sampling methods with a range of metrics and find that our systematic methods consistently retrieve more typologically diverse language selections than previous methods in NLP. Moreover, we provide evidence that this affects generalizability in multilingual model evaluation, emphasizing the importance of diverse language sampling in NLP evaluation.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑