arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2407.03480hep-phcond-mat.otherhep-th
收藏

在 $N=1$ 时检验平面 Gross-Neveu 与 Thirring 模型的等价性

Testing the equivalence between the planar Gross-Neveu and Thirring models at $N=1$

Everlyn Martins, Y. M. P. Gomes, Marcus Benghi Pinto, Rudnei O. Ramos

AI总结:

本文在两圈优化的微扰论框架内检验平面 Gross-Neveu 与 Thirring 模型在 $N=1$ 时的等价性,发现该等价性在零密度时成立,但在有限化学势下失效,并探讨了导致此差异的原因及可能的解决框架。

摘要:

已知 Fierz 恒等式预测,Gross-Neveu 和 Thirring 模型在描述由单一费米子味 $N=1$ 组成的系统时应是等价的。在此,我们在两圈优化的微扰论框架内考虑这两个模型的平面版本,以验证在考虑不同温度和密度状态时,预测的等价性是否明确显现。在密度消失时,我们的结果表明,只要 $N=1$,两个模型确实描述了完全相同的热力学。然而,在有限化学势下,我们发现 $N=1$ 的 Fierz 等价性不再成立。在检查了相关自由能之后,我们确定了导致这一令人困惑差异的贡献。最后,我们讨论了可以进一步理解并最终规避这一(目前悬而未决的)问题的不同框架。

英文摘要:

It is known that the Fierz identities predict that the Gross-Neveu and Thirring models should be equivalent when describing systems composed of a single fermionic flavor, $N=1$. Here, we consider the planar version of both models within the framework of the optimized perturbation theory at the two-loop level, in order to verify if the predicted equivalence emerges explicitly when different temperature and density regimes are considered. At vanishing densities, our results indicate that both models indeed describe exactly the same thermodynamics, provided that $N=1$. However, at finite chemical potentials we find that the $N=1$ Fierz equivalence no longer holds. After examining the relevant free energies, we have identified the contributions which lead to this puzzling discrepancy. Finally, we discuss different frameworks in which this (so far open) problem could be further understood and eventually circumvented.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑