arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2406.14713cs.CY
收藏

前沿AI的风险阈值

Risk thresholds for frontier AI

Leonie Koessler, Jonas Schuett, Markus Anderljung

AI总结:

针对前沿AI风险可接受度问题,研究对比能力阈值与风险阈值方法,提出企业以风险阈值为基础设定能力阈值并主要依后者决策的建议,同时指出监管机构应参与探索,未来风险评估可靠后风险阈值作用将更直接。

摘要:

前沿人工智能(AI)系统可能会给公共安全与安保带来日益严峻的风险。但何种程度的风险是可接受的?目前一种日益流行的方法是定义能力阈值,即当AI能力超出该阈值时,就认定AI系统风险过高。更直接的方法是定义风险阈值,直接明确多大的风险属于过高。例如,风险阈值可规定:网络犯罪分子利用某AI系统造成X数额经济损失的可能性,上升幅度不得超过Y个百分点。风险阈值的主要优势在于比能力阈值更具原则性,但主要缺点是更难进行可靠评估。因此,我们目前建议企业:(1)定义风险阈值,为其决策提供有原则的基础;(2)借助这些风险阈值来协助设定能力阈值;(3)随后主要依靠能力阈值进行决策。监管机构也应探索这一领域,因为归根结底,它们是定义风险阈值最具合法性的主体。如果AI风险评估变得更加可靠,风险阈值理应在决策中发挥越来越直接的作用。

英文摘要:

Frontier artificial intelligence (AI) systems could pose increasing risks to public safety and security. But what level of risk is acceptable? One increasingly popular approach is to define capability thresholds, which describe AI capabilities beyond which an AI system is deemed to pose too much risk. A more direct approach is to define risk thresholds that simply state how much risk would be too much. For instance, they might state that the likelihood of cybercriminals using an AI system to cause X amount of economic damage must not increase by more than Y percentage points. The main upside of risk thresholds is that they are more principled than capability thresholds, but the main downside is that they are more difficult to evaluate reliably. For this reason, we currently recommend that companies (1) define risk thresholds to provide a principled foundation for their decision-making, (2) use these risk thresholds to help set capability thresholds, and then (3) primarily rely on capability thresholds to make their decisions. Regulators should also explore the area because, ultimately, they are the most legitimate actors to define risk thresholds. If AI risk estimates become more reliable, risk thresholds should arguably play an increasingly direct role in decision-making.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑