arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.09643cs.LG
收藏

基于策略梯度的序列到序列方法用于时间序列预测

A Policy Gradient-Based Sequence-to-Sequence Method for Time Series Prediction

School of Management, Huazhong University of Science and Technology(华中科技大学管理学院)

Qi Sima, Xinze Zhang, Yukun Bao, Siyue Yang, Liang Shen

AI总结:

本文提出基于策略梯度的序列到序列方法,通过自适应输入选择策略提升时间序列预测的准确性和稳定性。

摘要:

基于循环神经网络的序列到序列架构已成为多步时间序列预测的首选方法。在这些模型中,解码器根据上下文输入生成未来值,通常为实际历史观测值(真实值)或之前生成的预测值。在训练过程中,使用真实值有助于稳定学习,但会创建训练和推理条件之间的不匹配,即曝光偏差,因为这些真实值在实际部署中不可用。另一方面,使用模型自身输出作为测试时的输入会导致预测步骤中的误差迅速累积。为缓解这些限制,我们引入了一种基于强化学习的新训练范式:一种基于策略梯度的方法,用于学习序列到序列预测模型的自适应输入选择策略。辅助模型首先为解码器合成合理的输入候选,可训练的策略网络通过策略梯度优化动态选择最有益的输入以最大化长期预测性能。在多种时间序列数据集上的实证评估证实,我们的方法在多步预测中相比传统方法提高了准确性和稳定性。

英文摘要:

Sequence-to-sequence architectures built upon recurrent neural networks have become a standard choice for multi-step-ahead time series prediction. In these models, the decoder produces future values conditioned on contextual inputs, typically either actual historical observations (ground truth) or previously generated predictions. During training, feeding ground-truth values helps stabilize learning but creates a mismatch between training and inference conditions, known as exposure bias, since such true values are inaccessible during real-world deployment. On the other hand, using the model's own outputs as inputs at test time often causes errors to compound rapidly across prediction steps. To mitigate these limitations, we introduce a new training paradigm grounded in reinforcement learning: a policy gradient-based method to learn an adaptive input selection strategy for sequence-to-sequence prediction models. Auxiliary models first synthesize plausible input candidates for the decoder, and a trainable policy network optimized via policy gradients dynamically chooses the most beneficial inputs to maximize long-term prediction performance. Empirical evaluations on diverse time series datasets confirm that our approach enhances both accuracy and stability in multi-step forecasting compared to conventional methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑