arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.09574cs.LG
收藏

利用离线偏好数据的在线老虎机学习以改进RLHF

Online Bandit Learning with Offline Preference Data for Improved RLHF

University of Southern California(南加州大学);Google DeepMind(谷歌DeepMind);USC(南加州大学)

Akhil Agnihotri, Rahul Jain, Deepak Ramachandran, Zheng Wen

AI总结:

针对现有在线强化学习方法无法利用离线偏好数据的问题,提出可借助离线偏好数据热启动的后验采样算法warmPref-PS,通过建模专家能力高效利用数据,在理论和实验上均验证了其优于基线的性能。

摘要:

基于人类反馈的强化学习(Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback, RLHF)是语言和图像生成式AI模型微调方法的核心。这类反馈通常以人类评分者给出的排序或偏好反馈的形式获取,而非直接采集分数,因为分数往往存在噪声。另一方面,强化学习理论与算法大多假设可获得奖励反馈。尤其是可通过主动学习助力自适应数据收集的在线学习方法,无法整合离线偏好数据。本文采用有限臂线性老虎机模型作为在线学习的原型模型,假设存在由“能力”未知的专家生成的离线偏好数据集。我们提出warmPref-PS,这是一种在线学习后验采样算法,可利用带噪声偏好反馈的离线数据集进行热启动。我们证明,通过对生成该数据集的专家“能力”建模,能够最高效地利用此类数据集。我们通过对其贝叶斯遗憾的全新理论分析,以及针对无限臂优化的近似损失函数的大量实证评估,支撑了我们的结论,该方法的表现显著优于基线方法。

英文摘要:

Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) is at the core of fine-tuning methods for generative AI models for language and images. Such feedback is often sought as rank or preference feedback from human raters, as opposed to eliciting scores since the latter tends to be noisy. On the other hand, RL theory and algorithms predominantly assume that a reward feedback is available. In particular, approaches for online learning that can be helpful in adaptive data collection via active learning cannot incorporate offline preference data. In this paper, we adopt a finite-armed linear bandit model as a prototypical model of online learning. We consider an offline preference dataset to be available generated by an expert of unknown 'competence'. We propose warmPref-PS, a posterior sampling algorithm for online learning that can be warm-started with an offline dataset with noisy preference feedback. We show that by modeling the 'competence' of the expert that generated it, we are able to use such a dataset most effectively. We support our claims with novel theoretical analysis of its Bayesian regret, as well as, extensive empirical evaluation of an approximate loss function that optimizes for infinitely many arms, and performs substantially better than baselines.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑