arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2406.09464cs.AI
收藏

GPT学、计算模型与硅基采样:我们应如何在认知科学中看待大语言模型?

GPT-ology, Computational Models, Silicon Sampling: How should we think about LLMs in Cognitive Science?

The University of Texas at Austin(德克萨斯大学奥斯汀分校)

Desmond C. Ong

AI总结:

本文梳理并评述了认知科学中用大语言模型研究认知的三种范式,指出其在科学推断上的挑战,并强调开源、训练数据透明和研究可重复性等关键问题。

摘要:

大语言模型已经席卷认知科学界。现在或许是时候梳理各种研究范式了,这些范式被用于对这些模型中的“认知”或人类认知作出科学推断。我们回顾了几种新兴的研究范式——GPT学、作为计算模型的大语言模型以及“硅基采样”——并回顾了近期在这些范式下使用大语言模型的论文。在此过程中,我们讨论了它们的主张以及在这些不同范式下进行科学推断所面临的挑战。我们强调了一些关于大语言模型的悬而未决的问题,这些问题必须得到解决才能推动我们的科学向前发展:闭源模型与开源模型;(缺乏可见性的)训练数据;以及大语言模型研究中的可重复性,包括就新任务的“超参数”(如指令和提示)形成惯例。

英文摘要:

Large Language Models have taken the cognitive science world by storm. It is perhaps timely now to take stock of the various research paradigms that have been used to make scientific inferences about ``cognition" in these models or about human cognition. We review several emerging research paradigms -- GPT-ology, LLMs-as-computational-models, and ``silicon sampling" -- and review recent papers that have used LLMs under these paradigms. In doing so, we discuss their claims as well as challenges to scientific inference under these various paradigms. We highlight several outstanding issues about LLMs that have to be addressed to push our science forward: closed-source vs open-sourced models; (the lack of visibility of) training data; and reproducibility in LLM research, including forming conventions on new task ``hyperparameters" like instructions and prompts.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑