arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.05063cs.CL
收藏

大型语言模型是否比人类更具同理心?

Are Large Language Models More Empathetic than Humans?

School of Computer and Communication Sciences(计算机与通信科学学院);École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne(洛桑联邦理工学院)

Anuradha Welivita, Pearl Pu

AI总结:

本文通过 1,000 名参与者对 2,000 个情绪对话提示的评估,比较了 GPT-4 等四种大型语言模型与人类的同理心回应能力,发现 LLMs 在统计上显著优于人类,其中 GPT-4 表现最佳,并提出了可扩展的评估框架。

摘要:

随着大型语言模型(LLMs)的出现,探究它们能否在情绪识别和同理心回应等领域超越人类已成为研究焦点。本文提出了一项综合性研究,探讨了四种最先进的大型语言模型——GPT-4、LLaMA-2-70B-Chat、Gemini-1.0-Pro 和 Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct——与人类基线相比的同理心回应能力。我们招募了 1,000 名参与者进行了一项被试间用户研究,评估人类和四种大型语言模型对 2,000 个情绪对话提示所生成回应的同理心质量,这些提示经过精心挑选,覆盖了 32 种不同的积极和消极情绪的广泛范围。我们的研究结果显示,大型语言模型的同理心回应能力在统计上显著优于人类。GPT-4 表现最为出色,与人类基准相比,被评为“良好”的回应增加了约 31%。紧随其后的是 LLaMA-2、Mixtral-8x7B 和 Gemini-Pro,它们在“良好”评级上分别增加了约 24%、21% 和 10%。我们进一步以更细的粒度分析了回应评分,发现某些大型语言模型在回应特定情绪方面显著优于其他模型。所提出的评估框架为评估新大型语言模型的同理心提供了一种可扩展且适应性强的途径,避免了在未来研究中重复本研究的发现。

英文摘要:

With the emergence of large language models (LLMs), investigating if they can surpass humans in areas such as emotion recognition and empathetic responding has become a focal point of research. This paper presents a comprehensive study exploring the empathetic responding capabilities of four state-of-the-art LLMs: GPT-4, LLaMA-2-70B-Chat, Gemini-1.0-Pro, and Mixtral-8x7B-Instruct in comparison to a human baseline. We engaged 1,000 participants in a between-subjects user study, assessing the empathetic quality of responses generated by humans and the four LLMs to 2,000 emotional dialogue prompts meticulously selected to cover a broad spectrum of 32 distinct positive and negative emotions. Our findings reveal a statistically significant superiority of the empathetic responding capability of LLMs over humans. GPT-4 emerged as the most empathetic, marking approximately 31% increase in responses rated as "Good" compared to the human benchmark. It was followed by LLaMA-2, Mixtral-8x7B, and Gemini-Pro, which showed increases of approximately 24%, 21%, and 10% in "Good" ratings, respectively. We further analyzed the response ratings at a finer granularity and discovered that some LLMs are significantly better at responding to specific emotions compared to others. The suggested evaluation framework offers a scalable and adaptable approach for assessing the empathy of new LLMs, avoiding the need to replicate this study's findings in future research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑