arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv周末暂无论文更新,休息一下吧,周末愉快~~
arXiv 2406.04488cs.LGcs.IR
收藏

音乐个性化中的负反馈

Negative Feedback for Music Personalization

SiriusXM Radio Inc.(SiriusXM广播公司)

M. Jeffrey Mei, Oliver Bembom, Andreas F. Ehmann

AI总结:

本文研究互联网广播下一歌曲推荐中的负反馈利用,证明真实负反馈作为训练目标和用户跳过作为序列输入可显著缩短训练时间、提升准确率与覆盖率。

摘要:

下一项目推荐系统通常仅利用正反馈以及随机采样的负反馈进行训练。我们展示了将真实负反馈既作为用户序列输入,又作为训练互联网广播下一歌曲推荐系统的负目标所带来的收益。具体而言,在训练期间使用显式负样本有助于将训练时间减少约60%,同时将测试准确率提高约6%;将用户跳过行为作为额外输入加入,也能显著扩大用户覆盖率,并略微提升准确率。我们测试了使用大量随机负样本以捕获“更难”负样本的影响,发现测试准确率会随着随机采样负样本数量增加而提高,但仅能提升到某一程度。过多随机负样本会导致假负样本,从而限制提升幅度,而且该提升仍低于使用真实负反馈时的效果。我们还发现,测试准确率对不同反馈类型的比例具有相当强的鲁棒性,并比较了不同反馈类型所学习到的嵌入。

英文摘要:

Next-item recommender systems are often trained using only positive feedback with randomly-sampled negative feedback. We show the benefits of using real negative feedback both as inputs into the user sequence and also as negative targets for training a next-song recommender system for internet radio. In particular, using explicit negative samples during training helps reduce training time by ~60% while also improving test accuracy by ~6%; adding user skips as additional inputs also can considerably increase user coverage alongside slightly improving accuracy. We test the impact of using a large number of random negative samples to capture a 'harder' one and find that the test accuracy increases with more randomly-sampled negatives, but only to a point. Too many random negatives leads to false negatives that limits the lift, which is still lower than if using true negative feedback. We also find that the test accuracy is fairly robust with respect to the proportion of different feedback types, and compare the learned embeddings for different feedback types.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑