arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.01855cs.CLcs.AI

TruthEval:一个用于评估LLM真实性与可靠性的数据集

TruthEval: A Dataset to Evaluate LLM Truthfulness and Reliability

David R. Cheriton School of Computer Science(戴维·R·切里顿计算机科学学院);University of Waterloo(滑铁卢大学)

Aisha Khatun, Daniel G. Brown

AI总结:

针对现有LLM评估基准的不足,提出TruthEval数据集,通过人工精选的敏感主题陈述评估LLM真实性与可靠性,初步分析揭示了LLM在简单任务中的失败实例。

摘要:

大型语言模型(LLM)评估是目前最重要的研究领域之一,现有基准被证明不足以完全代表LLM的各种能力。我们提出了一个名为TruthEval的精选数据集,包含针对敏感主题的挑战性陈述,用于LLM基准测试。这些陈述由人工精选,并包含已知的真值。这些类别经过选择,以区分LLM的能力与其随机性。我们使用该数据集进行了一些初步分析,发现LLM在简单任务中失败的多个实例,表明其无法理解简单问题。

英文摘要:

Large Language Model (LLM) evaluation is currently one of the most important areas of research, with existing benchmarks proving to be insufficient and not completely representative of LLMs' various capabilities. We present a curated collection of challenging statements on sensitive topics for LLM benchmarking called TruthEval. These statements were curated by hand and contain known truth values. The categories were chosen to distinguish LLMs' abilities from their stochastic nature. We perform some initial analyses using this dataset and find several instances of LLMs failing in simple tasks showing their inability to understand simple questions.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑