arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.18027cs.CLcs.AI

基于知识条件化LLM的自动化临床数据提取

Automated Clinical Data Extraction with Knowledge Conditioned LLMs

Freenome(弗里诺姆公司)

Diya Li, Asim Kadav, Aijing Gao, Rui Li, Richard Bourgon

AI总结:

本文提出一种基于上下文学习(ICL)的知识对齐框架,通过检索器和评分器结合内外部知识,解决LLM在临床报告提取中的幻觉问题,将关键字段F1分数平均提升12.9%。

摘要:

从临床和医学影像报告中提取肺部病灶信息,对于肺部疾病的研究和临床护理至关重要。大型语言模型(LLM)能够有效解释报告中的非结构化文本,但由于缺乏领域特定知识,它们经常产生幻觉,导致准确性降低,并给临床环境中的应用带来挑战。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种新颖的框架,通过上下文学习(ICL)将生成的内部知识与外部知识对齐。我们的框架采用检索器来识别内部或外部知识的相关单元,并使用评分器来评估检索到的内部知识规则的真实性和有用性,以对齐和更新知识库。使用专家策划的测试数据集进行的实验表明,与现有的ICL方法相比,这种ICL方法可以将关键字段(病灶大小、边缘和实性)的F1分数平均提高12.9%。

英文摘要:

The extraction of lung lesion information from clinical and medical imaging reports is crucial for research on and clinical care of lung-related diseases. Large language models (LLMs) can be effective at interpreting unstructured text in reports, but they often hallucinate due to a lack of domain-specific knowledge, leading to reduced accuracy and posing challenges for use in clinical settings. To address this, we propose a novel framework that aligns generated internal knowledge with external knowledge through in-context learning (ICL). Our framework employs a retriever to identify relevant units of internal or external knowledge and a grader to evaluate the truthfulness and helpfulness of the retrieved internal-knowledge rules, to align and update the knowledge bases. Experiments with expert-curated test datasets demonstrate that this ICL approach can increase the F1 score for key fields (lesion size, margin and solidity) by an average of 12.9% over existing ICL methods.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑