arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2406.01764cs.CV
收藏

基于近似的方法与基于人工智能的方法在腹主动脉瘤CT图像研究中的对比

An approximation-based approach versus an AI one for the study of CT images of abdominal aorta aneurysms

University of Perugia(佩鲁贾大学);University of Florence(佛罗伦萨大学);University of Basilicata(巴西利卡塔大学);Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu(锡比乌卢西恩·布拉加大学)

Lucrezia Rinelli, Arianna Travaglini, Nicolò Vescera, Gianluca Vinti

AI总结:

本研究对比了基于逼近论和基于U-net人工智能的两种方法,对腹主动脉瘤患者CT图像进行分割以提取主动脉通畅区域,旨在替代肾毒性造影剂,结果表明两种模型均能产生准确结果。

摘要:

本研究评估了应用于腹主动脉瘤患者计算机断层扫描(CT)图像的两种方法:一种是确定性的,基于逼近论工具;另一种是基于人工智能的。两者均旨在对基础CT图像进行分割,以提取主动脉血管的通畅区域,从而为诊断该病理提供肾毒性造影剂的替代方案。确定性方法采用采样Kantorovich算子及其背后的理论,利用这些算子在图像应用中的重建和增强能力,而基于人工智能的方法则依赖于U-net神经网络。对两种方法测试所得的结果进行了数值和视觉上的比较以评估其性能,表明两种模型均产生了准确的结果。

英文摘要:

This study evaluates two approaches applied to computed tomography (CT) images of patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm: one deterministic, based on tools of Approximation Theory, and one based on Artificial Intelligence. Both aim to segment the basal CT images to extract the patent area of the aortic vessel, in order to propose an alternative to nephrotoxic contrast agents for diagnosing this pathology. While the deterministic approach employs sampling Kantorovich operators and the theory behind, leveraging the reconstruction and enhancement capabilities of these operators applied to images, the artificial intelligence-based approach lays on a U-net neural network. The results obtained from testing the two methods have been compared numerically and visually to assess their performances, demonstrating that both models yield accurate results.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑