arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2405.08331cs.SIcs.CYcs.LG

社交媒体上关于社会群体的泛指表述与负面言论是否普遍?Twitter(X)数据的比较分析

Are Generics and Negativity about Social Groups Common on Social Media? A Comparative Analysis of Twitter (X) Data

Utrecht University(乌得勒支大学)

Uwe Peters, Ignacio Ojea Quintana

AI总结:

本研究开发机器学习分类器分析超百万条推文,发现多数人物相关推文无社会泛指表述,含泛指的推文互动量更高,且政治群体相关负面泛指推文比族裔群体的更普遍、转发更多。

摘要:

泛指表述(无量化限定的概括性陈述)被认为在交流中十分普遍,当这类表述针对社会群体时,可能会冒犯他人并引发极化,因为泛指表述掩盖了个体间的差异。针对社会群体的泛指表述在Twitter(X)上可能尤为常见,但这一点此前尚未得到探究。为此,我们利用机器学习(ML)技术开发了一个社会泛指表述自动分类器,将其应用于超过100万条关于人物的推文并开展分析。我们发现,大多数(78%)关于人物的推文不含泛指表述。不过,包含社会泛指表述的推文获得了更多“点赞”和转发。此外,尽管近期的心理学研究可能会让人预测,针对政治群体的泛指推文比针对族裔群体的泛指推文更常见,但我们发现了相反的结果。然而,与近期“针对政治群体的敌意比针对性别和族裔群体的敌意更少受到社会规范约束”的观点一致,针对政治群体的负面泛指推文的普遍程度和转发量都显著高于针对族裔群体的负面推文。本研究首次基于机器学习揭示了社会泛指表述在Twitter上的使用情况与影响。

英文摘要:

Generics (unquantified generalizations) are thought to be pervasive in communication and when they are about social groups, this may offend and polarize people because generics gloss over variations between individuals. Generics about social groups might be particularly common on Twitter (X). This remains unexplored, however. Using machine learning (ML) techniques, we therefore developed an automatic classifier for social generics, applied it to more than a million tweets about people, and analyzed the tweets. We found that most tweets (78%) about people contained no generics. However, tweets with social generics received more 'likes' and retweets. Furthermore, while recent psychological research may lead to the prediction that tweets with generics about political groups are more common than tweets with generics about ethnic groups, we found the opposite. However, consistent with recent claims that political animosity is less constrained by social norms than animosity against gender and ethnic groups, negative tweets with generics about political groups were significantly more prevalent and retweeted than negative tweets about ethnic groups. Our study provides the first ML-based insights into the use and impact of social generics on Twitter.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑