arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2404.04445cs.CLcs.IR

迈向现实的少样本关系抽取:一个新的元数据集与评估

Towards Realistic Few-Shot Relation Extraction: A New Meta Dataset and Evaluation

University of Arizona(亚利桑那大学);Technical University of Cluj-Napoca(克卢日-纳波卡技术大学)

Fahmida Alam, Md Asiful Islam, Robert Vacareanu, Mihai Surdeanu

AI总结:

本文构建面向现实场景的少样本关系抽取元数据集,涵盖 NYT29、WIKIDATA 和 TACRED,并在未见关系、有限数据及大量无关候选提及条件下评估六种方法,发现性能普遍较低且无显著优胜者。

摘要:

我们推出了一个用于少样本关系抽取的元数据集,其中包含两个源自现有监督关系抽取数据集 NYT29(Takanobu 等人,2019;Nayak 和 Ng,2020)与 WIKIDATA(Sorokin 和 Gurevych,2017)的数据集,以及 TACRED 数据集(Sabo 等人,2021)的少样本形式。重要的是,所有这些少样本数据集都是在现实假设下生成的,例如:测试关系不同于模型此前可能见过的任何关系、训练数据有限,并且大量候选关系提及与任何感兴趣的关系都不对应。利用这一大型资源,我们对六种近期的少样本关系抽取方法进行了全面评估,并观察到没有任何一种方法能成为明确的赢家。此外,该任务上的总体性能较低,表明未来仍有大量研究需求。我们发布数据的所有版本,即监督版和少样本版,以供未来研究使用。

英文摘要:

We introduce a meta dataset for few-shot relation extraction, which includes two datasets derived from existing supervised relation extraction datasets NYT29 (Takanobu et al., 2019; Nayak and Ng, 2020) and WIKIDATA (Sorokin and Gurevych, 2017) as well as a few-shot form of the TACRED dataset (Sabo et al., 2021). Importantly, all these few-shot datasets were generated under realistic assumptions such as: the test relations are different from any relations a model might have seen before, limited training data, and a preponderance of candidate relation mentions that do not correspond to any of the relations of interest. Using this large resource, we conduct a comprehensive evaluation of six recent few-shot relation extraction methods, and observe that no method comes out as a clear winner. Further, the overall performance on this task is low, indicating substantial need for future research. We release all versions of the data, i.e., both supervised and few-shot, for future research.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑