arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2404.03314cs.GTcs.SYeess.SY

使用无悔算法学习在远期电力市场中竞价

Learning to Bid in Forward Electricity Markets Using a No-Regret Algorithm

Arega Getaneh Abate, Dorsa Majdi, Jalal Kazempour, Maryam Kamgarpour

AI总结:

针对电力市场竞价中需预知对手报价的不现实假设,提出基于事后信息的乘法权重更新无悔学习算法,发现其可能推高社会成本与出清价格并放大供应商市场势力。

摘要:

在当前电力市场文献中,使用博弈论方法进行策略性报价是一种常见做法。然而,这些方法通常依赖于策略性竞价者事先了解竞争对手报价的假设,无论这种了解是完全的还是带有某种不确定性的。这未必是一个现实的假设。本文采取不同方法,放宽了这一假设,并将无悔学习算法用于重复博弈。具体而言,通过利用有关竞争对手报价的事后信息,学习者可以实施无悔算法来优化其决策。基于这一信息,我们采用乘法权重更新算法,在多轮拍卖中调整竞价策略,以最小化其悔值。数值结果表明,当使用所提出的学习方法时,社会成本和市场出清价格可能高于经典博弈论方法对应的结果。给市场监管者的启示是,电力市场中供应商可能拥有比经典分析所显示的更大的市场势力。

英文摘要:

It is a common practice in the current literature of electricity markets to use game-theoretic approaches for strategic price bidding. However, they generally rely on the assumption that the strategic bidders have prior knowledge of rival bids, either perfectly or with some uncertainty. This is not necessarily a realistic assumption. This paper takes a different approach by relaxing such an assumption and exploits a no-regret learning algorithm for repeated games. In particular, by using the \emph{a posteriori} information about rivals' bids, a learner can implement a no-regret algorithm to optimize her/his decision making. Given this information, we utilize a multiplicative weight-update algorithm, adapting bidding strategies over multiple rounds of an auction to minimize her/his regret. Our numerical results show that when the proposed learning approach is used the social cost and the market-clearing prices can be higher than those corresponding to the classical game-theoretic approaches. The takeaway for market regulators is that electricity markets might be exposed to greater market power of suppliers than what classical analysis shows.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑