arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2403.07541cs.SEcs.DB
收藏

使用大型语言模型进行过程建模

Process Modeling With Large Language Models

Humam Kourani, Alessandro Berti, Daniel Schuster, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

AI总结:

本文提出一种利用大型语言模型(LLMs)从文本描述自动生成和迭代细化过程模型的框架,结合创新提示策略、安全生成协议和错误处理机制,支持BPMN和Petri网导出,显著提升过程建模的可访问性与效率。

摘要:

在业务流程管理(BPM)领域,过程建模在将复杂的过程动态转化为易于理解的视觉表示方面发挥着至关重要的作用,有助于理解、分析、改进和自动化组织流程。传统的过程建模方法通常需要大量专业知识且可能耗时。本文探讨了将大型语言模型(LLMs)集成到过程建模中,以增强过程建模的可访问性,为非专家提供更直观的切入点,同时提高专家的效率。我们提出了一个框架,利用LLMs从文本描述开始自动生成和迭代细化过程模型。我们的框架涉及创新的提示策略以有效利用LLMs,并配有安全的模型生成协议和错误处理机制。此外,我们实例化了一个具体系统来扩展我们的框架。该系统对生成的模型提供稳健的质量保证,并支持以标准建模符号导出它们,例如业务流程建模符号(BPMN)和Petri网。初步结果展示了该框架简化过程建模任务的能力,凸显了生成式AI在BPM领域的变革潜力。

英文摘要:

In the realm of Business Process Management (BPM), process modeling plays a crucial role in translating complex process dynamics into comprehensible visual representations, facilitating the understanding, analysis, improvement, and automation of organizational processes. Traditional process modeling methods often require extensive expertise and can be time-consuming. This paper explores the integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into process modeling to enhance the accessibility of process modeling, offering a more intuitive entry point for non-experts while augmenting the efficiency of experts. We propose a framework that leverages LLMs for the automated generation and iterative refinement of process models starting from textual descriptions. Our framework involves innovative prompting strategies for effective LLM utilization, along with a secure model generation protocol and an error-handling mechanism. Moreover, we instantiate a concrete system extending our framework. This system provides robust quality guarantees on the models generated and supports exporting them in standard modeling notations, such as the Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) and Petri nets. Preliminary results demonstrate the framework's ability to streamline process modeling tasks, underscoring the transformative potential of generative AI in the BPM field.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑