arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.12876cs.LGcs.CRcs.DC

非独立同分布数据孤岛下的联邦多任务学习:一项实验研究

Federated Multi-Task Learning on Non-IID Data Silos: An Experimental Study

Shanghai Jiao Tong University(上海交通大学)

Yuwen Yang, Yuxiang Lu, Suizhi Huang, Shalayiding Sirejiding, Hongtao Lu, Yue Ding

AI总结:

本文提出 FMTL-Bench 基准框架,通过七组覆盖 Non-IID 数据划分的实验,从数据、模型与优化层面系统评估联邦多任务学习方法。

摘要:

创新的联邦多任务学习(Federated Multi-Task Learning,FMTL)方法融合了联邦学习(Federated Learning,FL)与多任务学习(Multi-Task Learning,MTL)的优势,能够在多任务学习数据集上开展协同模型训练。然而,该领域目前尚缺乏一种整合 FL 与 MTL 各自独特特征的全面评估方法。本文通过提出一个名为 FMTL-Bench 的新颖框架来填补这一空白,用于系统性评估 FMTL 范式。该基准覆盖数据、模型和优化算法层面的多个方面,包含七组对比实验,并封装了大量非独立同分布(Non-IID)数据划分场景。我们提出了一套系统性流程,用于比较具有不同指标的基线方法,并针对通信开销、时间和能耗开展了案例研究。通过详尽实验,我们旨在为现有基线方法的优势与局限提供有价值的洞见,从而推动关于 FMTL 在实际场景中最佳应用的持续讨论。源代码可在 https://github.com/youngfish42/FMTL-Benchmark 获取。

英文摘要:

The innovative Federated Multi-Task Learning (FMTL) approach consolidates the benefits of Federated Learning (FL) and Multi-Task Learning (MTL), enabling collaborative model training on multi-task learning datasets. However, a comprehensive evaluation method, integrating the unique features of both FL and MTL, is currently absent in the field. This paper fills this void by introducing a novel framework, FMTL-Bench, for systematic evaluation of the FMTL paradigm. This benchmark covers various aspects at the data, model, and optimization algorithm levels, and comprises seven sets of comparative experiments, encapsulating a wide array of non-independent and identically distributed (Non-IID) data partitioning scenarios. We propose a systematic process for comparing baselines of diverse indicators and conduct a case study on communication expenditure, time, and energy consumption. Through our exhaustive experiments, we aim to provide valuable insights into the strengths and limitations of existing baseline methods, contributing to the ongoing discourse on optimal FMTL application in practical scenarios. The source code can be found on https://github.com/youngfish42/FMTL-Benchmark .

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑