arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.09708astro-ph.GAastro-ph.COastro-ph.HE
收藏

奇特射电环是强大射电星系的不死鸟吗?

Are Odd Radio Circles phoenixes of powerful radio galaxies?

Stanislav Shabala, Patrick Yates-Jones, Larissa Jerrim, Ross Turner, Martin Krause, Ray Norris, Baerbel Koribalski, Miroslav Filipovic, Larry Rudnick, Chris Power, Roland Crocker

AI总结:

本文提出奇特射电环(ORCs)可能是强大射电星系遗迹瓣被激波重新激发形成,通过相对论流体动力学模拟验证了激波可产生类ORC形态,且宿主星系位置与观测一致。

摘要:

奇特射电环(ORCs)是一类低表面亮度的圆形天体,直径约一角分。ORCs最近在澳大利亚平方公里阵列探路者(ASKAP)数据中被发现,随后通过其他仪器的后续观测得到确认,但其起源仍不确定。在本文中,我们提出ORCs可能是强大射电星系的遗迹瓣,因激波穿过而重新获得能量。使用相对论流体动力学模拟并在后处理中计算同步辐射,我们表明遗迹射电瓣的浮力演化本身太慢,无法产生观测到的ORC形态。然而,激波的穿过可以产生填充型和边缘增亮型的类ORC形态,适用于多种激波和观测方向。预测圆形ORCs的宿主星系位于射电辐射几何中心附近,与这些天体的观测一致。对于椭圆ORCs,宿主星系可能显著偏移,可能给宿主星系的准确识别带来挑战。观测到的ORC数量计数与中等功率射电星系为其前身星的范式基本一致。

英文摘要:

Odd Radio Circles (ORCs) are a class of low surface brightness, circular objects approximately one arcminute in diameter. ORCs were recently discovered in the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) data, and subsequently confirmed with follow-up observations on other instruments, yet their origins remain uncertain. In this paper, we suggest that ORCs could be remnant lobes of powerful radio galaxies, re-energised by the passage of a shock. Using relativistic hydrodynamic simulations with synchrotron emission calculated in post-processing, we show that buoyant evolution of remnant radio lobes is alone too slow to produce the observed ORC morphology. However, the passage of a shock can produce both filled and edge-brightnened ORC-like morphologies for a wide variety of shock and observing orientations. Circular ORCs are predicted to have host galaxies near the geometric centre of the radio emission, consistent with observations of these objects. Significantly offset hosts are possible for elliptical ORCs, potentially causing challenges for accurate host galaxy identification. Observed ORC number counts are broadly consistent with a paradigm in which moderately powerful radio galaxies are their progenitors.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑