arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.09683cs.HCcs.AIcs.CY
收藏

探索人机交互中的‘积极摩擦’行为模型

Exploring a Behavioral Model of "Positive Friction" in Human-AI Interaction

Institute of Design (ID), Illinois Institute of Technology(伊利诺伊理工学院设计学院(ID))

Zeya Chen, Ruth Schmidt

AI总结:

本文提出‘积极摩擦’模型,用于描述AI用户和开发者体验中的摩擦益处,探讨如何通过积极摩擦提升AI设计与应用。

摘要:

设计无缝、无摩擦的用户体验长期以来是应用行为科学和人工智能领域的主要趋势,旨在使有益行为易于高效。然而在某些情境中,摩擦可能真正有益,例如有意延迟以增加反思,防止个体采用自动或偏见行为,并增加意外发现的机会。近年来,AI的普及和广泛可用性增加了研究摩擦如何帮助或阻碍AI用户的需求,也提示需考虑积极摩擦如何帮助AI从业者,尤其是在开发过程中(如与多样化团队合作)以及如何指导AI设计。本文首先提出“积极摩擦”模型,用于描述当前摩擦在用户体验和开发者体验中的益处,诊断潜在摩擦需求,以及如何利用积极摩擦生成解决方案,特别是在AI持续进步和新机会出现时。随后,本文在AI用户和开发者背景下探讨该模型,提出采用混合“AI+human”视角的价值,并通过建议进一步探索的问题作为结论。

英文摘要:

Designing seamless, frictionless user experiences has long been a dominant trend in both applied behavioral science and artificial intelligence (AI), in which the goal of making desirable actions easy and efficient informs efforts to minimize friction in user experiences. However, in some settings, friction can be genuinely beneficial, such as the insertion of deliberate delays to increase reflection, preventing individuals from resorting to automatic or biased behaviors, and enhancing opportunities for unexpected discoveries. More recently, the popularization and availability of AI on a widespread scale has only increased the need to examine how friction can help or hinder users of AI; it also suggests a need to consider how positive friction can benefit AI practitioners, both during development processes (e.g., working with diverse teams) and to inform how AI is designed into offerings. This paper first proposes a "positive friction" model that can help characterize how friction is currently beneficial in user and developer experiences with AI, diagnose the potential need for friction where it may not yet exist in these contexts, and inform how positive friction can be used to generate solutions, especially as advances in AI continue to be progress and new opportunities emerge. It then explores this model in the context of AI users and developers by proposing the value of taking a hybrid "AI+human" lens, and concludes by suggesting questions for further exploration.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑