arXivDaily arXiv每日学术速递 周一至周五更新
arXiv 2402.09015cs.CLcs.AI
收藏

迈向更好的人机智能体对齐:评估 LLM 驱动应用中的任务效用

Towards better Human-Agent Alignment: Assessing Task Utility in LLM-Powered Applications

Microsoft Research(微软研究院);Pennsylvania State University(宾夕法尼亚州立大学)

Negar Arabzadeh, Julia Kiseleva, Qingyun Wu, Chi Wang, Ahmed Awadallah, Victor Dibia, Adam Fourney, Charles Clarke

AI总结:

本文提出 AgentEval 框架,通过自动生成针对特定应用目的的评价标准来量化 LLM 驱动应用的效用,以验证应用功能与用户需求的对齐程度,并分析了量化器的鲁棒性。

摘要:

大语言模型(LLMs)领域的快速发展催生了大量应用,这些应用促进多个智能体之间的协作,以协助人类完成日常任务。然而,在评估 LLM 驱动的应用是否真正提升用户体验和任务执行效率方面,仍存在显著差距。这凸显了验证 LLM 驱动应用效用的迫切需求,尤其是通过确保应用功能与最终用户需求之间的对齐。我们提出 AgentEval,它为数学问题提供了一种实现,这是一个新颖的框架,旨在通过自动提出一组针对任何给定应用独特目的而定制的标准,来简化效用验证过程。这使得能够进行全面评估,根据所建议的标准量化应用的效用。我们对量化器工作的鲁棒性进行了全面分析。

英文摘要:

The rapid development in the field of Large Language Models (LLMs) has led to a surge in applications that facilitate collaboration among multiple agents to assist humans in their daily tasks. However, a significant gap remains in assessing whether LLM-powered applications genuinely enhance user experience and task execution efficiency. This highlights the pressing need for methods to verify utility of LLM-powered applications, particularly by ensuring alignment between the application's functionality and end-user needs. We introduce AgentEval provides an implementation for the math problems, a novel framework designed to simplify the utility verification process by automatically proposing a set of criteria tailored to the unique purpose of any given application. This allows for a comprehensive assessment, quantifying the utility of an application against the suggested criteria. We present a comprehensive analysis of the robustness of quantifier's work.

机构、总结、中文摘要均由AI分析而来,可能存在错误,请以论文正文为准。

↑